Electric Field minimum in a spherical capacitor.

Kizaru
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The potential difference \Delta\phi between the plates of a spherical capacitor is kept constant. Show that then the Electric Field at the surface of the inner sphere will be a minimum if a = \frac{1}{2}b

Homework Equations


E = \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r^{2}}
between the plates.

The Attempt at a Solution


Not really sure. I know that
\Delta\phi = - \int E dl
and that it is constant. But not really sure how to proceed from here. I think I need to find some sort of new equation for E, then find the minima? Answer in the back of the book is E = 4 (delta)(phi) / b

The answer latex didn't work, sorry.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your line integral can be taken along a radial line, from a to b.

BTW, I would use \Delta\phi instead of \nabla\phi for the total potential difference. It's just a notational convention, but it is a very common one, and I was a little bit confused at first.
 
turin said:
Your line integral can be taken along a radial line, from a to b.

BTW, I would use \Delta\phi instead of \nabla\phi for the total potential difference. It's just a notational convention, but it is a very common one, and I was a little bit confused at first.

Err, yes I meant delta phi. Taking the line integral doesn't help with the solution. If I did take the line integral, I get the electric potential difference. But this isn't helpful because
\Delta\phi = \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\left(\frac{1}{b}-\frac{1}{a}\right)

And then how would I find the minimum of the electric field from there?

I already passed in the problem--probably done incorrectly. I used the mean value theorem to integrate over E from b to a, then divide by (b-a). Then I took the derivative with respect to a, and tried to set equal to 0 but there were no values for which that occurred. I did manage to get rid of one of the two terms when a = (1/2)b.
 
Consider Q as a function of a (or b, or their ratio).
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top