Increase in spin rate as object collases to black hole

hexexpert
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
It has been said that physics still occur inside a black hole, excluding the singularity. It's just that we can't observe the physics. The spin of black hole is measurable. What I want to know is; does the INCREASE in spin as the object gets ever smaller stop increasing at the moment in becomes a black hole? Certainly the spin doesn't increase to infinity. If the observed spin did continue to increase for a bit before coming to a stop would this would imply a hard radius below the event horizon? Has this been specifically excluded? If anyone has a link to the subject of spin as an object transitions to becoming a black hole I'd appreciated it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hexexpert said:
It has been said that physics still occur inside a black hole, excluding the singularity. It's just that we can't observe the physics. The spin of black hole is measurable. What I want to know is; does the INCREASE in spin as the object gets ever smaller stop increasing at the moment in becomes a black hole? Certainly the spin doesn't increase to infinity. If the observed spin did continue to increase for a bit before coming to a stop would this would imply a hard radius below the event horizon? Has this been specifically excluded? If anyone has a link to the subject of spin as an object transitions to becoming a black hole I'd appreciated it.

You can't observe the frequency of the spin. You can observe the angular momentum (by its frame-dragging effect), but that is constant in the absence of external interactions.
 
Also, the singularity in a
Kerr black hole is not the same as the singularity in a Schwarzschild black hole. It is called a ring singularity because it does not collapse down to zero radius.
 
You might find this link of interest-

http://people.sissa.it/~rezzolla/Whisky/WhiskyI/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hexexpert said:
What I want to know is; does the INCREASE in spin as the object gets ever smaller stop increasing at the moment in becomes a black hole? Certainly the spin doesn't increase to infinity. If the observed spin did continue to increase for a bit before coming to a stop would this would imply a hard radius below the event horizon? Has this been specifically excluded? If anyone has a link to the subject of spin as an object transitions to becoming a black hole I'd appreciated it.

If the body undergoing collapse is rotating too fast in the first place (eg above the Kerr limit), then it will not collapse into a black hole. If it collapses, the only externally observable property describing its rotation is the angular momentum, which is a conserved quantity (it can increase or decrease if the black hole is not isolated).

Interiors of realistic spinning black holes remain a hard and vastly unexplored topic. A seminal paper by Poisson and Israel [1] presented the theory of mass inflation: the unstable inward and outward pressure and energy flows near the inner lightlike horizon should enter a runaway amplification due to their own gravitational effect – this could be indeed a form of "hard radius" where most infalling matter could smash into before a further collapse.

[1] E. Poisson, W. Israel, "Internal structure of black holes", Phys. Rev. D 41, 1796–809 (1990).
 
Last edited:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
605
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
57
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top