To which of the two cubes has a larger moment of inertia?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining which of two cubes has a larger moment of inertia and the reasoning behind it. One participant believes the right cube has a larger moment of inertia due to its rotation not being around the principal axes, while another emphasizes the need for calculations to confirm this. The conversation touches on the relevant equations for calculating moment of inertia, specifically mentioning the relationship between arbitrary and parallel axes. There is a suggestion to first analyze a 2-D case for better understanding before applying it to the cubes. The need for precise calculations is highlighted as essential for a definitive answer.
Cosmossos
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
To which of the two cubes has a larger moment of inertia?
untitled.JPG

I think it's the right one, is it correct?
How can I explain that without using the parallel axis theorem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cosmossos said:
To which of the two cubes has a larger moment of inertia?
View attachment 23012
I think it's the right one, is it correct?
How can I explain that without using the parallel axis theorem?

Why do you say the right one? Are you familiar with the relevant equation for calculating the moment of inertia?
 
what relevant equation?

I think it's the right one because We know that the minimal moment of inertia is throw the principal axes that goes throw the center of mass. in the right one , the rotation isn't throw the principal axes . there is also the following theorem :

The moment of inertia about an arbitrary axis is equal to the
moment of inertia about a parallel axis passing through the
center of mass plus the moment of inertia of the body about
the arbitrary axis, taken as if all of the mass M of the body
were at the center of mass.

Am I wrong?
 
Last edited:
Cosmossos said:
what relevant equation?

I think it's the right one because We know that the minimal moment of inertia is throw the principal axes that goes throw the center of mass. in the right one , the rotation isn't throw the principal axes . there is also the following theorem :

The moment of inertia about an arbitrary axis is equal to the
moment of inertia about a parallel axis passing through the
center of mass plus the moment of inertia of the body about
the arbitrary axis, taken as if all of the mass M of the body
were at the center of mass.

Am I wrong?

There may be a shortcut way to tell which has a higher moment of inertia, but for me, I'd need to calculate it. I'd use the standard definition of the Mmoment of inertia, and evaluate thge integral for the diagonal case. I don't think you can use the parallel axis theorm, since the two axes are not parallel.

I'd do the 2-D case first, to see if it offered some intuition. That is, the moment of inertia for a flat rectangular sheet, with the axes going straight versus diagonal.
 
I think they'll turn out to be equal. Try computing the moment of inertia tensor.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
I was thinking using 2 purple mattress samples, and taping them together, I do want other ideas though, the main guidelines are; Must have a volume LESS than 1600 cubic centimeters, and CAN'T exceed 25 cm in ANY direction. Must be LESS than 1 kg. NO parachutes. NO glue or Tape can touch the egg. MUST be able to take egg out in less than 1 minute. Grade A large eggs will be used.
Back
Top