Derivation of Bernoulli's Principle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of Bernoulli's principle, highlighting two approaches: using the Euler equation and energy conservation. The Euler method is noted to be more complex, yet it is derived from the Navier-Stokes equations, which encompass various fluid conditions. Bernoulli's equation is essentially a special case of the energy equation, stemming from the conservation principles of mass, momentum, and energy. Participants express a willingness to assist by comparing the two derivation methods, emphasizing the importance of understanding the underlying mathematics. Overall, the conversation underscores the interconnectedness of fluid mechanics principles and the challenges posed by mathematical complexity.
MaxManus
Messages
268
Reaction score
1
In my Fluid Mechanics textbook they use the Euler equation to derive Bernoulli's principle for incompressible fluids with gravity. In my earlier introduction to mechanics textbook they used energy conservation. Is there a reason for using the Euler equation or is it just to show more ways to derive Bernoulli's principle.
The reason I ask is because I find the Euler method more difficult.

I use Kundu/Cohen Fluid Mechanics
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
well the origin in fluid mechanics theoris is NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS as they cover all the conditions of the fluid as ( steady or unsteady ) comprissible or not , newtenion or not and bernollis equation is a special case of the navier stokes and so is eulers you can study this equation it will enable you to study many parameters pressure , time , velocity k, flow rate even power also
 
As maxx mentioned Bernoulli's is derived from the full Navier-Stokes equations. Taking the full set of equations and ignoring viscosity you get the Euler equations.

Recall that these governing equations are based on Conservation of Mass, Momentum, and Energy. Those form a set of 5 coupled equations.

Bernoulli's is a special case basically of the energy equation. So, it is derived from Euler equation which is derived from conservation of energy.

edit: Perhaps you can show us the two different approaches. We might be able to help a little more knowing what you're looking at.
 
Thanks, then I will sit down and try to learn the cross-product rules.

Minger: the problem is my math knowledge.
 
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top