Negative Voltage Using Faraday's Law

AI Thread Summary
Negative voltage in Faraday's Law indicates that the induced voltage opposes changes in magnetic flux, not a reversal of voltage direction. The minus sign symbolizes this opposition, akin to an "ungrateful fellow" resisting its creator. Faraday's Law itself does not specify current direction; understanding current direction requires Lenz's Law. Therefore, while studying Faraday's Law, focus on the induced voltage's nature rather than its direction. This clarification enhances comprehension of electromagnetic induction principles.
FeDeX_LaTeX
Science Advisor
Messages
436
Reaction score
13
Hello;

When we use Faraday's Law we can get a negative voltage as a result. What does this mean? I'm guessing it means voltage in the other direction?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When we use Faraday's Law we can get a negative voltage as a result. What does this mean?
No it does not mean like that. The minus sign indicates that the induced voltage in the loop tends to oppose any change of magnetic flux in the loop. For memory aid you can make humor of this fact thinking induced emf as an ungrateful fellow who after being created wants to oppose its creator- the magnetic fux.
I'm guessing it means voltage in the other direction?
Faraday's law says nothing about the direction of voltage ( actually direction of current) in the loop. So don't worry about the direction of current in the loop while studying Faraday's law.
To find out the direction of the current in the loop you will need to study Lenz's law.
 
Thanks, I get it.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top