This problem is killing me [calculation of electron transition]

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the initial quantum number (n_i) for an electron transitioning to the ground state in a hydrogen atom, emitting a photon of wavelength 93.14 nm. The initial calculation yielded an incorrect n_i value of 0.7, while the correct answer should be 7. Participants clarified that the negative energy change (∆E) should be considered when solving the equation, leading to the correct interpretation of the Rydberg constant. The importance of accurate calculations and understanding the signs in energy transitions was emphasized. Ultimately, the correct n_i value was confirmed to be 7 after resolving the confusion regarding the constants used.
eq123
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
this problem is killing me! [calculation of electron transition]

i've been trying to solve this problem.. the answer should be 7.. my answer is 0.7 !

What is the value of n_i for an electron that emits a photon of wavelength 93.14 nm when it returns to the ground state in the H atom?

my solution..

n_f=1
λ=93.14 nm×(10^(-9) m)/(1 nm)=93.14×10^(-9) m
∆E=hν=hc/λ=(6.63×10^(-34)×3.00×10^8)/(93.14×10^(-9))≈2.14×10^(-18)
∆E=-2.18×10^(-18) (1/(n_f^2 )-1/(n_i^2 ))
2.14×10^(-18)=-2.18×10^(-18) (1/1^2 -1/(n_i^2 ))
-2.14/2.18=1-1/(n_i^2 )
1.982= 1/(n_i^2 )
n_i^2=0.5045
n_i=√0.5045≈0.7

n_i = n initial
n_f = n final
λ = wavelength ( lambda )
∆E = energy of the transition
h = plank's constant
ν = frequency ( nu )
c = speed of light

if reading the solution is an issue.. just past it in microsoft word and activate the equation mode..
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org


eq123 said:
if reading the solution is an issue.. just past it in microsoft word and activate the equation mode..

We have something called LaTeX for such situations. And I don't have, use, nor want to use Microsoft Word.

When I solve

\frac 1 {93.14nm} = R_{\infty} (\frac 1 {1^2} - \frac 1 {n^2})

for n, I get 6.85 - close enough to 7. No idea what is 2.18x10-18, as far as I can tell Rydberg constant is 1.097x107 m-1.

--
methods
 


Borek said:
for n, I get 6.85 - close enough to 7. No idea what is 2.18x10-18, as far as I can tell Rydberg constant is 1.097x107 m-1.

2.18x10-18 is the Rhydberg constant in joules.
 


OK, I know what have happened. Check your math, you made a simple error when solving.

--
methods
 


i already figured it out.. since the electron is returning to its ground state.. it is releasing energy.. which means that ∆E is negative.. after taking that into consideration.. the answer should be 7..

2.18x10-18 is the Rhydberg constant in joules.
wow.. it makes more sense to me now!

thank you.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top