Does only the Tangential momentum count

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gmaximus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Count Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that when converting linear momentum to angular momentum, only the tangential component of the linear momentum contributes to the angular momentum about a fixed axis. A particle colliding tangentially with a rotating disc transfers all its momentum into angular momentum, while a collision at an angle results in a reduced contribution based on the cosine of that angle. The angular momentum of the system remains constant during the collision, regardless of the direction of the particle's motion. This understanding emphasizes the relationship between linear and angular momentum in rotational dynamics. The conversation effectively highlights the importance of the collision angle in determining the angular momentum generated.
Gmaximus
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Does only the Tangential momentum "count"...

When convertering the momentum from linear to angular?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a particle with linear momentum \vec p, its angular momentum about some origin is \vec L = \vec r \times \vec p. So, if I understand what you're asking, the answer is yes.
 
So a particle traveling into a disc (thats free to rotate) in an inelastic collision that collides on a path tangent to the disc has all of its momentum converted into angular momentum, whearas a path of 30° with respect to the tanget line would have cos(30) times that angular momentum?
 
I'd phrase it a bit differently. (As I don't like saying that linear momentum "converts" to angular momentum.) Let me assume that the axis of the disk is fixed; the disk is free to rotate, but not translate. In any case, prior to the collision the particle has a certain angular momentum with respect to that axis. Yes, the amount of angular momentum it has depends on its direction of motion. During the collision, the angular momentum (of the entire system) does not change. Does this help?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top