Fermion annihilation operators from position and momentum

haael
Messages
537
Reaction score
35
Is it possible to express fermion annihilation operator as a function of position and momentum?

I've seen on Wikipedia the formula for boson annihilation operator:
<br /> \begin{matrix} a &amp;=&amp; \sqrt{m\omega \over 2\hbar} \left(x + {i \over m \omega} p \right) \\ a^{\dagger} &amp;=&amp; \sqrt{m \omega \over 2\hbar} \left( x - {i \over m \omega} p \right) \end{matrix}<br />

But what about fermions? Is it possible to get anticommutation relations from canonical relations alone, or is it necessary to postulate something else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
haael said:
But what about fermions? Is it possible to get anticommutation relations from canonical relations alone, or is it necessary to postulate something else?
You have to use Grassmann numbers or something like that. This can be seen by inspection of the (fermionic) anti-commutators

\{b, b\} = 2b^2 = 0
\{b^\dagger, b^\dagger\} = 2{b^\dagger}^2 = 0

which cannot be derived from commuting objects.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top