FBDs of Stacked Boxes: Understanding Force Distribution in Connected Objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter InvisibleMan1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding force distribution in two stacked boxes using free body diagrams (FBDs). The original poster struggled to visualize the forces acting on the boxes, particularly the action-reaction forces as described by Newton's third law. They noted that box A experiences an upward force from box B, which in turn feels a downward force from A, complicating the analysis. The ground must provide a force to support both boxes, accounting for the weight of box A on top of box B. Ultimately, the poster found clarity in the problem after considering the interactions between the forces involved.
InvisibleMan1
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
To help me understand how a force is distributed over multiple connected objects, I have been trying to draw the FBDs of two stacked boxes which are sitting on the ground. I haven't been able to solve the problem however, and looking for the solution with Google did not turn up anything useful. I'm aware of Newton's third law, but I still have not been able to solve this... I'm at a loss, which is why I am posting here.

Here is an image of the problem:
fbd_problem.jpg


One attempt at solving it using Newton's third law ended up as (what appeared to be) an infinite loop of action-and-reaction forces going up and down the stack. I tried thinking of the two objects as a single object, but that just ended in guesswork without anything real concrete.

What would the FBD of A and the FBD of B look like, with all involved forces?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So A and B each feel a gravitational force (also resultant in reactionate forces meaning you have to draw two upward vectors in the Earth's core, but i think we're ignoring them here). Since A is not moving, it has to experience an equal (in magnitude) force upward: this can only come from B, and this force's reactionate brother is the force B experiences from A, the latter obviously pushing down. This force makes B extra heavy and thus the ground under B must deliver a force not only for B itself, but also the load B is carrying (this is indirectly what allows B to hold A up in its place). This last force from the ground to B also has a reactionate brother pushing from the blocks onto the ground (which is the force that would make for a weighing scale placed under B to react)

I hope this helps?
 
That solved the problem, thanks :)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top