How much visible light is emitted by a 100 W tungsten light bulb?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    bodies Light
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on estimating the percentage of visible light emitted by a 100 W tungsten light bulb, treating the filament as a black body. Participants suggest using Wien's displacement law and the spectral energy density formula to analyze the emitted wavelengths. The filament's operating temperature is noted to be around 3000K, and the visible spectrum is defined as ranging from 400nm to 750nm. The Stefan-Boltzmann law is recommended for estimating the filament's temperature based on its power output and effective area. The conversation highlights the difference between theoretical and practical temperatures of the filament, emphasizing the low emissivity of tungsten.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


Assume that the tungsten filament of an incandescent 100 W light bulb can be considered as a black body.
Estimate the percentage of the irradiated energy in the visible spectra.
The effective area of the filament is 100 mm^2.
There are 3 more questions in the exercise that I'll try to do on my own.

Homework Equations



Not even sure.

The Attempt at a Solution



What I really think I need is the expression of the function u(\lambda ) that we can see in the picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wiens_law.svg.
Otherwise than this, I've attempted to use Wien's displacement law to see what wavelength of light is most created by the filament. But it's not a good idea, I couldn't even make a percentage guess. For instance if I get a wavelength of the kilometer order (I know I should get infrared which is somehow shorter), I'd have no idea about what would be the percentage of energy irradiated in the visible spectra. I'm just out of ideas. I'd like to listen to you guys, what would you do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spectral energy density: u(\lambda,T)=\frac{8\pi hc}{\lambda^5}\frac{1}{exp(\frac{hc}{\lambda k_BT})-1}
A typical incandescent light bulb has operating temperature of about 3000K. So one unknown is known :biggrin:
The visible spectrum is very narrow, i.e. from 400nm to 750nm. If you plot the function u on this interval, you will see that it's nearly a straight line. So the power of visible radiation emitted is:
P_{visible}=\int^{\lambda_{red}}_{\lambda_{blue}}Au(\lambda,T)d\lambda \approx A\frac{u(\lambda_{red})+u(\lambda_{blue})}{2}(\lambda_{red}-\lambda_{blue})
 
hikaru1221 said:
The spectral energy density: u(\lambda,T)=\frac{8\pi hc}{\lambda^5}\frac{1}{exp(\frac{hc}{\lambda k_BT})-1}
A typical incandescent light bulb has operating temperature of about 3000K. So one unknown is known :biggrin:
The visible spectrum is very narrow, i.e. from 400nm to 750nm. If you plot the function u on this interval, you will see that it's nearly a straight line. So the power of visible radiation emitted is:
P_{visible}=\int^{\lambda_{red}}_{\lambda_{blue}}Au(\lambda,T)d\lambda \approx A\frac{u(\lambda_{red})+u(\lambda_{blue})}{2}(\lambda_{red}-\lambda_{blue})
Thank you very much. Your function u reminded me of Plank's law, so I found in wikipedia your expression: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck's_law#Overview.
I'll try to finish the exercise tomorrow, right now I'm going to bed.
Out of curiosity, you gave me an extra information, namely that the filament is at 3000K. But, shouldn't I derive it say by using the fact that it's a 100 W light bulb and that the effective area of the filament is 100 mm^2?
 
fluidistic said:
Thank you very much. Your function u reminded me of Plank's law, so I found in wikipedia your expression: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck's_law#Overview.
I'll try to finish the exercise tomorrow, right now I'm going to bed.
Out of curiosity, you gave me an extra information, namely that the filament is at 3000K. But, shouldn't I derive it say by using the fact that it's a 100 W light bulb and that the effective area of the filament is 100 mm^2?

I would look at the Stefan–Boltzmann law. You've got 100W coming out of the area of the filament. Doesn't that let you estimate its temperature?
 
fluidistic said:
Out of curiosity, you gave me an extra information, namely that the filament is at 3000K. But, shouldn't I derive it say by using the fact that it's a 100 W light bulb and that the effective area of the filament is 100 mm^2?

Thanks. Now you remind me of Stephan-Boltzmann law :biggrin: The first thing coming to my mind was an actual light bulb, so I used the 3000K temperature to estimate. Using Stephan-Boltzmann law would be more theoretically accurate, so I encourage you to apply the law :smile:
By the way, I didn't expect the theoretical temperature to be just 2000K (calculate and you will see it). Quite a big difference from practice.

P.S: That big difference is true. From this page: emissivity of tungsten aged filament is from 0.032 to 0.35, quite low but possible for metal.
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/emissivity-coefficients-d_447.html
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top