[Linear Algebra] Showing equality via determinant properties

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equality of two determinants without direct evaluation. The initial approach involves using row operations on the first determinant, specifically applying the operation -tR1 - R2 to simplify the second row. This leads to recognizing that the terms can be factored, allowing for the extraction of a coefficient related to (1-t^2). A key point raised is the necessity of adjusting the determinant by dividing by t when a row is multiplied by t to maintain equality. The conversation emphasizes the careful application of determinant properties and row operations to achieve the desired result.
CentreShifter
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Problem:

Show, without evaluating directly, that
<br /> \left|\begin{matrix}<br /> a_1+b_1t&amp;a_2+b_2t&amp;a_3+b_3t \\<br /> a_1t+b_1&amp;a_2t+b_2&amp;a_3t+b_3 \\<br /> c_1&amp;c_2&amp;c_3 \end{matrix}\right|<br /> =<br /> (1-t^2)\left|\begin{matrix}<br /> a_1&amp;a_2&amp;a_3 \\<br /> b_1&amp;b_2&amp;b_3 \\<br /> c_1&amp;c_2&amp;c_3 \end{matrix}\right|<br />

Clearly, here I'm supposed to use the determinant properties, do some row ops on the first array, and end up with the RHS.

1. -tR1-R2 -> Row2 (no coefficient on determinant).

<br /> \left|\begin{matrix}<br /> a_1+b_1t&amp;a_2+b_2t&amp;a_3+b_3t \\<br /> b_1-b_1t^2&amp;b_2-b_2t^2&amp;b_3-b_3t^2 \\<br /> c_1&amp;c_2&amp;c_3 \end{matrix}\right|<br />

From here I can see that b_1-b_1t^2=b_1(1-t^2). But multiplying R2 by \frac{1}{1-t^2} means I have to also pull that out as a coefficient to the entire array. So now:
<br /> \frac{1}{1-t^2}<br /> \left|\begin{matrix}<br /> a_1+b_1t&amp;a_2+b_2t&amp;a_3+b_3t \\<br /> b_1&amp;b_2&amp;b_3 \\<br /> c_1&amp;c_2&amp;c_3 \end{matrix}\right|<br />

Another row op, R1 -> R1-tR2, and I have my RHS, except the coefficient is reciprocated. Am I doing this wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you multiply a row or column by some t, the value of the determinant becomes t times the original value. So you need to divide the whole determinant by t so as to keep it unchanged.

ehild
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top