How much heat is evolved Thermochemistry Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a thermochemistry question regarding the heat evolved in the reaction of calcium oxide with water, which is exothermic with a ΔH of -64.8 kJ/mol. The participant seeks clarification on whether the heat released should be considered positive or negative, concluding that it should be viewed as a positive value since it represents heat produced. Another contributor explains that considering the reaction as producing Ca(OH)2 and 64.8 kJ of heat helps balance the enthalpy equation, reinforcing the idea that heat is indeed released. The conversation highlights a misunderstanding in the professor's homework answer sheet, which the participants believe misrepresents the concept of enthalpy. Overall, the exchange emphasizes the importance of understanding enthalpy in thermochemical reactions.
anonymity
Messages
162
Reaction score
0
"How much heat is evolved" Thermochemistry Question

This is a question from a general chemistry I quiz i had a few days ago. I got this question, and all other questions like it correct, but here's the thing.

Calcium oxide and water react in an exothermic reaction:
CaO(s) + H2O(l) → Ca(OH)2(s) DHrxn° = −64.8 kJ/mol

How much heat would be liberated when 7.15 g CaO(s) is dropped into a beaker containing 152 g H2O?

We have an exam tomorrow and I've been studying the majority of the weekend and I just started working on a thermochemistry worksheet that our instructor was kind enough to provide for us, and for every single "how much heat is evolved" or "how much heat would be released" question has an answer of negative _____.


The answer to this question would be positive, right? Because the negative enthalpy says that heat is released, and heat released = heat evolved = heat produced.

I think he's just trying to stress the concept of enthalpy but if this is the case i think he is definitely going about it in the wrong way > <


(PS: If i was allowed to see the answer that i recorded, this post would not be necessary, sorry)

Your Friend,
Anonymous
 
Physics news on Phys.org


anonymity said:
The answer to this question would be positive, right? Because the negative enthalpy says that heat is released, and heat released = heat evolved = heat produced.
Yes.

Here is how I think of it. The products of the reaction are actually:
Ca(OH)2(s) + 64.8 kJ of heat​
If you think of it that way, then:
1. The reaction is now balanced in terms of enthalpy. Taking the +64.8kJ into account gives zero for ΔH
2. A product of the reaction is 64.8 kJ of heat (per mole), meaning that heat is given off.​

Hope that helps.
 


yeah that helps. That's what i thought the whole time but my professor did it wrong on our homework answer sheet so i just had to make sure before the exam.

Thanks alot,

anonymous

edit:

felt that i needed to tell you that you devised a very clever way of thinking about that. I more-or-less just drilled "NEGATIVE ENTHALPY IS HEAT GENERATED" into my brain, but you created a working system. -.- cool.
 


I have found it's easier to remember things when they make sense :smile:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top