Resolving Power and minimum seperation

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahazen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum separation of two stars observed through a telescope with a 2.42 m diameter aperture and a light wavelength of 547 nm. The formula used is theta = 1.22 * lambda / D, leading to a proposed minimum separation of 2.818 x 10^-4 m. Participants clarify that a distance of 1022 m for the stars is unrealistic, suggesting it should be 10^22 m instead. This adjustment significantly changes the minimum separation calculation to 2.758 x 10^15 m. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate distance measurements in astronomical observations.
ahazen
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
(a) Two stars are photographed utilizing a telescope with a circular aperture of diameter of 2.42 m and light with a wavelength of 547 nm. If both stars are 1022 m from us, what is their minimum separation so that we can recognize them as two stars (instead of just one)?

theta=1.22* lambda/D

(b) A car passes you on the highway and you notice the taillights of the car are 1.27 m apart. Assume that the pupils of your eyes have a diameter of 6.7 mm and index of refraction of 1.36. Given that the car is 14.2 km away when the taillights appear to merge into a single spot of light because of the effects of diffraction, what wavelength of light does the car emit from its taillights (what would the wavelength be in vacuum)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think?
 
Just to check my own understanding. Is the answer to part a) 2.818*10^-4m? Come to think off it, can the star be only 1022m away from us?

Delzac
 
Delzac said:
Just to check my own understanding. Is the answer to part a) 2.818*10^-4m? Come to think off it, can the star be only 1022m away from us?
No, if you were only around 1 km from the center of a star, you would be inside the star's core. Your body would be crushed to a size of a small stone, under such extreme temperature and pressure that the atoms in your body would lose their electrons and the nuclei would fuse to form new elements. You would become an extraordinarily dense, hot mishmash that is barely even comprehensible by most humans.

Perhaps you mean the distance of the stars is 1 x 1022 m away from us?
 
If the distance is 10^22m, then will be answer be 2.758*10^15m?

delzac
 
ok:) thank you:)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top