Why are there different rate constants?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluepen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants Rate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of the rate constant (k) for a first-order decomposition reaction of substance A, using concentration data over time. Two calculations yield slightly different values for k: 0.0998 min-1 at t = 1 minute and 0.100 min-1 at t = 4 minutes. The discrepancy raises questions about potential experimental errors in measuring concentration, with participants noting that the difference is minimal (0.2% error), suggesting that such variations are often acceptable in experimental contexts. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precision in measurements while acknowledging that small differences in calculated values can occur in practical scenarios.
bluepen
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey,

The decomposition of A is first order, and [A] is monitored. The following data are recorded:
t / min 0 1 2 4
[A]/[M] 0.100 0.0905 0.0819 0.0670

Calculate k.

Using [A] = [A]0e-kt,

Calculating at t = 1
0.0905 = 0.1e-k(1)
0.905 = e-k
-0.0998=-k
k = 0.0998 min-1

Calculating at t = 4
0.0670 = 0.1e-k(4)
0.67 = e-k(4)
k = 0.100 min-1

How can this be!? :confused:
The question is an example from http://http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/c123/intratel.html"

Thanks,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Experimental error in measuring the concentration? 0.1 and 0.0998 aren't that far apart.
 
In most experiments I would consider 0.1 and 0.0998 to be the same - 0.2% error is relatively small.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top