Equilateral Triangle Point Charge Problem: Solving for the Unknown Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the value of a third point charge in an equilateral triangle configuration where two charges are equal to q. The initial approach incorrectly assumed the contributions of potential energy from the charges were additive without considering their individual interactions. The correct method involves recognizing that the potential energy at the location of the third charge must account for the influence of both existing charges. The correct value for the third charge, z, is determined to be -q/2, which balances the system to require zero net work for placement. The participant acknowledges their misunderstanding and clarifies their approach to the problem.
Romperstomper
Question: Three point charges, which are initially at infinity, are placed at the corners of an equilateral triangle with sides d. Two of the point charges have a charge of q. If zero net work is required to place the three charges at the corners of the triangle, what must the value be of the third charge?

What I did:
q = 2 of the charges
z = the third charge
d = the final distance between each charge

0 = Uelec_q + Uelec_q + Uelec_z

0 = kq(\frac{-1}{d}) + kq(\frac{-1}{d}) + kz(\frac{-1}{d})

0 = \frac{-2kq}{d} - \frac{kz}{d}

-2q = z

The correct answer is \frac{-q}{2} = z
Can anyone see what I did wrong? I've tried this problem a few times and have gotten the same answer each time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Romperstomper said:
Question: Three point charges, which are initially at infinity, are placed at the corners of an equilateral triangle with sides d. Two of the point charges have a charge of q. If zero net work is required to place the three charges at the corners of the triangle, what must the value be of the third charge?

What I did:
q = 2 of the charges
z = the third charge
d = the final distance between each charge

0 = Uelec_q + Uelec_q + Uelec_z

0 = kq(\frac{-1}{d}) + kq(\frac{-1}{d}) + kz(\frac{-1}{d})

No work is needed to bring in the first charge (q).
The second charge (q) feels the field of the first one. The work needed to place it at a distance d from the first charge is
W_1 = k(\frac{q^2}{d}).
The third charge feels the force from both charges already present.The potential at the third corner of the triangle is
U=2k(\frac{q}{d}).
So the work done when the charge z is brought in from infinity is z times this potential,
W_2 = 2k(\frac{qz}{d}).
And the total work is zero.


ehild
 
Ahh. I see where I messed up now. I wasn't taking into account the second charge in the Uelec formula and was leaving out the Uelec of the other 'z' on each. I was looking at it as all points moving together at the same time instead of each one moving individually.

Thanks a bunch! :biggrin:
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top