How do I calculate the movement of air in a valveless pulse jet engine?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the movement of air in a valveless pulse jet engine, understanding the physics of airflow post-combustion is essential. The combustion creates a vacuum that influences air movement through the exhaust and intake pipes, necessitating calculus for accurate modeling. The discussion highlights the importance of the Navier-Stokes Equations for simulating fluid dynamics, as a simple simulation may not capture the complexities involved. Additionally, the size of openings affects pressure exertion, which is crucial for understanding airflow dynamics. A basic approach involves calculating the energy from propane combustion and its impact on air pressure and temperature.
telepresence
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to create a piece of software that can approximate the physics of a valveless pulse jet engine. What I need right now is to figure out the math behind the moving air. How would I calculate how the air from the combustion chamber after combustion (assumed for simplicity to be instantaneous) would move down the exhaust and intake pipes relative to the size of the pipes and the pressure of the air in the chamber? (Yes, I realize this needs calculus) As the gas leaves the combustion chamber, It forms a vacuum in its wake that eventually stops the flow of air and starts pulling it back. I need the equations for this. I also could use some explanation of how the size of an opening effects the amount of pressure placed on it when in this type of scenario (how much of the pressure is exerted on the openings to the exhaust and inlet tubes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you just trying to approximate some particular quantity or are you trying to simulate the entire flow? Because simulating the entire flow is an extremely complex problem that will need a lot more than calculus. Ever hear of the Navier Stokes Equations? That is where you need to start if you are going to simulate a fluid.
 
for right now I was going to be content with just a simple simulation that incorporated the heat cycle only. I was calculating the amount of energy given by combustion of a given amount of propane (based on the amount of fresh air in the chamber, somewhere between 2.15 and 9.6 [the flamability limits of propane] percent of the air) and then calculating how much that would heat the air. From that calculating the increase in pressure (since I'm assuming all of this is instant, I can also assume that the volume is constant. I know that will result in a much more powerful result than is actually possible, but it's a start).

RandomGuy88 said:
Ever hear of the Navier Stokes Equations? That is where you need to start if you are going to simulate a fluid.
Thanks for the info, I'll look into it.
 
does anyone know a conversion for pressure difference to acceleration in air?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top