Electric potential in an open circuit

AI Thread Summary
In an open circuit, an uncharged capacitor will have a potential difference of zero, resulting in zero charge. However, if a capacitor is connected to an open voltage source and one plate has access to free charges, it can still charge without drawing current from the source. This phenomenon can be demonstrated using techniques like the Avramenko plug, where static charges can accumulate on the capacitor. The discussion highlights that traditional education may overlook the potential for capacitors to charge in open circuits, encouraging further exploration of this concept. Overall, the ability of capacitors to acquire charge in open circuits is a topic worth investigating.
yoyoloto
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was wondering, if a circuit is open, would capacitors still have a potential difference ?
If there is no potential difference, can we say its potential is 0 then obtain a charge equal to 0 for the capacitor's charge ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
What I meant is that the capacitor isn't charged in the first place, the circuit is all set up and stuff but its never closed, therefore no current. So I don't think there could be any potential either, making its charge 0.
 
hi yoyoloto! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
yoyoloto said:
What I meant is that the capacitor isn't charged in the first place, the circuit is all set up and stuff but its never closed, therefore no current. So I don't think there could be any potential either, making its charge 0.

oh i see!

ok, then yes, if the https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=112" is uncharged, and placed into an open circuit, the potential difference (voltage) across it will remain zero, an so will the charge :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the capacitor is uncharged, then it doesn't matter if the circuit is closed or open, the electric potential is zero. An uncharged capactor by itself is also zero electric potential.
 
The problem with schooling today. Typically, the answer is no. The capacitor will not acquire a charge connected to an open circuit and the student may build a simple lab circuit to reinforce this claim as taught. Allowing them to chug along with no further investigations with open potentials. Which is very misleading. I would encourage the student to further explore the open potential as follows and see what results you get.
Connect the capacitor across an open voltage but also connect a aerial to one plate only. Single wire. The cap will chargeup while drawing zero current from the source supply. Aka avramenko plug.
Any capacitor connected to an open voltage will indeed. Charge up so long as one of the plates has Access to free charges, including static charges along the surfaces but not closed loop back to your circuit. Remains electrically an open circuit from the source supply. Another way is an open voltage single wire with diode block to a cap and it's tank circuit closed by a spark gap. The output closed ckt having a single Earth connection but input driving side is open to the output ckt. Power can be produced via potential alone and has already been demonstrated all over the world and there are numerous patents on this technique.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top