Some thought about direct sum and

  • Thread starter Thread starter td21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direct sum Sum
AI Thread Summary
In a direct sum of vector spaces V, U, and W, it is established that V equals the sum of U and W, and there is no intersection between U and W aside from the zero vector. The uniqueness of the expression of every vector v as a sum of u and w arises from the properties of direct sums, ensuring that each vector can be represented in one and only one way. This uniqueness is critical because it guarantees that the decomposition into U and W is consistent and well-defined. Clarification is needed regarding whether U and W are subspaces, as all subspaces inherently include the zero vector, which is the only point of intersection. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the structure of direct sums in linear algebra.
td21
Gold Member
Messages
177
Reaction score
8
I know that if V is a direct sum of U and W,
then
1. V=U+W
2 there is no intersection between U and W


However, in some books there is an equivalent condition:
3.Every v can be expressed uniquely as u+w


Why's that? Why can we be so sure about the word "unique"? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
td21 said:
I know that if V is a direct sum of U and W,
then
1. V=U+W
2 there is no intersection between U and W

You aren't making a precise statement. Are U and W supspaces? What do you mean when you say "there is no intersection"? All subspaces contain the zero vector.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top