Binary phase diagrams - understanding the eutectic point

Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
1) So, does the binary phase always represent the materials 100% on each end? That is to say, if you have lead and antimony, the right side will always represent 100% of one of the two, and the other side will present 100% of the other. If we look in the middle of the diagram, it's 50-50%, right?

2) The eutectic point is basically an ideal point on the diagram that represents the lowest cooling point based on the certain percentages of each materials. This is a tested value.


Do I have it correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Femme_physics said:
1) So, does the binary phase always represent the materials 100% on each end? That is to say, if you have lead and antimony, the right side will always represent 100% of one of the two, and the other side will present 100% of the other. If we look in the middle of the diagram, it's 50-50%, right?

Yes, but it might be 50%-50% by weight percent or by atomic percent. A complete phase diagram will tell you which one is being used. Some diagrams have one scale on the bottom x axis and the other on the top (see http://www.interfluxusa.com/images/Eutectic_graf.jpg", for example).

Femme_physics said:
2) The eutectic point is basically an ideal point on the diagram that represents the lowest cooling point based on the certain percentages of each materials. This is a tested value.

The eutectic point is the temperature and composition that marks the lowest temperature at which the solution can be entirely liquid.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, but it might be 50%-50% by weight percent or by atomic percent. A complete phase diagram will tell you which one is being used. Some diagrams have one scale on the bottom x-axis and the other on the top (see here, for example).

Ah, I see.

The eutectic point is the temperature and composition that marks the lowest temperature at which the solution can be entirely liquid.

Is a better way to put it :)

Thanks a bunch Mapes.

BTW - I've been wondering for a while now, what does your avatar represent?
 
Femme_physics said:
BTW - I've been wondering for a while now, what does your avatar represent?

It's meant to represent chemical-mechanical coupling: a melding of schematics for forces, springs, atomic force microscopy, nanoindentation, mortar & pestle, and ligand-receptor binding. Thx for asking!
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top