IF I want to research breeder reactors, do I go for NucEng or Nuclear Physics?

AI Thread Summary
For researching breeder reactors, pursuing a degree in nuclear engineering is recommended over nuclear physics. While nuclear physicists focus on subatomic particles, nuclear engineers address the practical challenges of reactor design and performance. Breeder reactors have been built but have faced significant engineering hurdles that require further understanding and innovation. The theoretical aspects of breeder reactors are well established, but the engineering solutions are more complex. Engaging with specific literature and online resources is essential for gaining insights into this field.
zheng89120
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
title
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
zheng89120 said:
title
If you want to research you should start reading the specific literature.
 
zheng89120 said:
title

Hope you don't mean me. I know the theory but have no direct experience with breeders. And from my understanding the ones that have been built have not been all that successful. There do seem to be a lot of resources online so start there.
 
NUCENG said:
Hope you don't mean me. I know the theory but have no direct experience with breeders. And from my understanding the ones that have been built have not been all that successful. There do seem to be a lot of resources online so start there.
If so, here.
Unlike me many people here can answer on your questions regarding fission reactors.
I think that some of them are experts in this field.
 
I would recommend you study nuclear engineering.

Most nuclear physicists study the nucleus and other subatomic particles like quarks Some nuclear physicists are more applied science and work on nuclear reactors, but you won't find many.

There has been a lot of experience with breeder reactors. I am sure there are several things that need more understanding. Yet, they are a lot of engineering problems to increase the performance of breeders.
 
Last edited:
The nuclear physics of breeder reactors is well understood.

The engineering aspects are more challenging. Study nuclear engineering if one wishes to do research concerning breeder reactors. Look at courses in reactor physics (neutron transport theory), materials science, mechanics of materials, fluid mechanics/dynamics, corrosion, . . .
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top