Purchasing Test Equipment for Electronics Enthusiast on a Budget

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on purchasing test equipment for electronics projects on a budget of $3,000. The user is considering a multifunction PC-based platform, TinaLab II, which offers essential tools but has limitations, such as a lower frequency function generator than recommended. Concerns are raised about the popularity and effectiveness of PC-based instruments compared to traditional equipment, with suggestions to buy separate multimeters for simultaneous measurements and a dedicated power supply to avoid damage. The conversation also highlights the challenges of sourcing affordable equipment internationally, particularly from the US to the UK, due to high shipping costs. Overall, the advice leans towards investing in individual equipment for better functionality and reliability.
Odysseus
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Back again to ask another question about test equipment. I'm very new at this so please bear with me. I'm trying to work through this https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521646456/?tag=pfamazon01-20. In order to do a lot of the exercises in the book I need access to an oscilloscope, function generator, counter and a tabletop multimeter. To name a few. As I'm sure yall know, that's a hefty investment in equipment, which I'm prepared to make, but I plan on doing more projects after this one and I want the stuff I buy now to be useful when I move on. My maximum budget is 3K.

So far the most appealing option I've come across is a multifunction pc platform: http://www.tinalab.com/English/tina...|utmctr=TINAlab ii&__utmv=-&__utmk=101751553". It appeals to me because has all of the equipment I need, is expandable and you combine into one program simulation and data collection. Plus the software and hardware together is well within my price range. There are a few hangups though, Rutledge recommends a 15 MHz function generator, TinaLab II only provides up to 4 MHz. Rutledge also recommends a 3A power supply, I'm not sure that TinaLab II can provide that as the power rating is stated in volts on the website.

To my understanding, PC based platforms are not popular with most electronics enthusiasts. Is this a bad purchase? If it is a good purchase, is there a workaround that would allow me to increase the frequency of the function generator? Should I just buy the individual equipment? I'd appreciate any advice yall can give me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
There is an amazing quantity of top notch test gear always going at ridiculous prices on the US Ebay.

For those of us on this side of the atlantic it is very frustrating to see for instance a scope not selling over there at $20, that would fetch over £100 here with fierce bidding.

The problem is transport costs which might be in excess of £150 for that scope.

So you are (I think) well placed to take advantage.

PC based instruments are really good these days and can even perform/display more than one function simultaneously, something a multimeter can't do.

For this reason you would be better off with a couple of (not too) cheap separate multimeters so that you can simultaneously measure say current and voltage or monitor the voltage in two places or whatever simultaneously.
Further it is no good having your multi voltage/capacitor/resitance etc meter hooked up monitoring some voltage when you want to measure the value of some component.

The power supply definitely needs to be separate from the measuring instruments -especially at 3 amps - you can do a lot of (expensive) damage very quickly if things go wrong with current at that level.

Modern scopes often come with a signal source, further a second generator is useful if you want to study the effect of combining waveforms. So get a second (cheap) generator if you go for the Tina.

Work at the frequencies you mention is reliant on good construction practice. Circuits will not behave as you expect with 'rats nests'. this also applies to connecting cables connectors and matching networks. You can't just poke a bare wire into a press fit terminal as you can get away with in audio work. You often have to solder up a proper board, even for a prototype or matching pad.
So allow for this.

go well
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top