Why dimensionless coupling in nonlinear sigma model corresponding to temperature?

ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me this:
In QTF theory book of Schoeder say:
In nonlinear sigma model L=\intdx\frac{1}{2g^{2}}(\delta
_{\mu}n^{\rightarrow})(consider2<d<4 where d is the dimension number of spacetime).If we consider the Lagrangian as the Boltzman weight of a partition function,then the dimensionless coupling square(g)M^{d-2} is proportional with temperature.But I do not understand why?
Thank you very much in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry,I have a mistaking:I have missed the square of the derivative of vector n in the Lagrangian of nonlinear sigma model.By the way I would like to ask another question:Why the critical temperature Tc corresponding with the fix-point T*(where T* is Wilson fix-point of T=g^{2}M^{d-2})(and T is corresponding with temperature as I asked above).
 
I would like to add that the condition pose on n that n^{2}=1 in nonlinear sigma model.
 
It seem to me the critical phenomena would be related with Landau-Ginzbua theory(classical saying).Then I do not understand why the nonlinear sigma model also relate with critical theory?In Landau theory the T-Tc corresponds to mass parameter,but how about the nonlinear model,because in this model where is mass parameter?
 
It seem to me that at critical temperature point the heat capacity has a leap,then the temperature at this point stops to decrease(or increase),so the beta function corresponding the temperature(beta(T))(in nonlinear sigma model) is zero at this point.So that critical temperature Tc coincides with the Wilson fix-point of the temperature.Is that correct?
 
Please teach this is correct or not:
It seem that in first and second phase transition,at critical point the heat capacity is diverge.
Thank you very much for any answer.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top