Color of Sky Without Atmosphere or 50 Times Densers

AI Thread Summary
Without an atmosphere, the sky would appear black, with the sun as a bright white spot, allowing stars to be visible even during the day. A 50 times denser atmosphere would likely lead to constant cloud cover, making the sky invisible, similar to conditions on Venus. Rayleigh scattering explains why the sky is blue, as it is more effective for shorter wavelengths of light. The formula indicating that scattering decreases as 1/λ^4 suggests that shorter wavelengths scatter much more than longer ones. Overall, atmospheric density significantly influences sky color and visibility.
JSGandora
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
Color of Sky Without Atmosphere or 50 Times Denser

What would be the color of the sky if the Earth had no atmosphere?

Since the scattering of light is due to the fact that the wavelengths of blue are small enough to be obstructed by the particles in the atmosphere, whereas longer wavelengths would be obstructed less, would the Earth having no atmosphere mean that the color of the sky be entirely black with a bright white spot which is the sun?

Also, what would happen if the Earth's atmosphere was 50 times denser than it is?

Lastly, my physics books says that "scattering decreases, in fact, as \frac{1}{\lambda ^4}" and gives no further elaboration. Can anyone tell me what this means?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the sky would be black with stars visible even during the day. You may want to watch some photos made from orbital stations and long time ago from Moon. Or even compare the sky viewed from ground level with the look from an airplane, traveling 10,000m higher, where atmosphere is over twice less dense.

The question about 50 times dendier atmosphere is non-physical - so dense atmosphere would have to differ from our in many factors, especially it would be always cloudy (like atmosphere of Venus is), so you'd never see the sky.

Reyleigh's scattering, which is responsible for blue sky and red sunsets is much stronger for short wavelengths of light than for long one - that's why the sky is blue.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering
 
I see, thanks. So what you're trying to say is, that if the atmosphere is 50 times denser, then we would never see the sky? Is that only because of the clouds on venus? What if there were no clouds? What would you see then?

Also, thanks for the wikipedia page, however I'm still confused about scattering decreases as \frac{1}{\lambda^4}.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top