PV Diagram Problem (ideal efficiency vs actual efficiency)

  • Thread starter Thread starter stonecoldgen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram Efficiency
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the ideal and actual efficiency of a thermodynamic cycle represented on a PV diagram for an ideal gas. The ideal efficiency was calculated to be 67% using the formula 1 - TL/TH, where temperatures were derived from the PV=nRT equation. However, the actual efficiency requires determining the heat input (Qin) and work output (Wout), which are not clearly defined in the problem. Participants emphasize the need to analyze heat flow during different segments of the cycle and apply the first law of thermodynamics to find Qh and Qc. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the complexity of determining actual efficiency in non-Carnot cycles.
stonecoldgen
Messages
108
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The PV diagram below (I will describe it) shows a cycle for 4.87moels of an ideal gas. The path ab is along an isothermal line.

Pressure is in atm and volume in m3


Point a: (.08, 6)
Point b: (.24,2)
Point c: (.08, 2)


Find the ideal and the actual efficiency of the cycle

Homework Equations


1atm=101,300Pa
PV=nRT
1-TL/TH=\epsilon
\epsilonactual=Wout/Qin




The Attempt at a Solution


First of all, convert the pressures in atm to Pascals, to make life easier.


The temperature at a and b is 1,200K, the temperature at c is 400K. (found with PV=nRT)

so i thought that plugging that into 1/TL/TH=\epsilon would give me the ideal efficiency. I got 67%


However, I don't know how to get the actual efficiency. I don't know what Qin and Wout are exactly
 
Physics news on Phys.org
is there anyone there?
 
stonecoldgen said:
Find the ideal and the actual efficiency of the cycle

Homework Equations


1atm=101,300Pa
PV=nRT
1-TL/TH=\epsilon
\epsilonactual=Wout/Qin

The Attempt at a Solution


First of all, convert the pressures in atm to Pascals, to make life easier.

The temperature at a and b is 1,200K, the temperature at c is 400K. (found with PV=nRT)

so i thought that plugging that into 1/TL/TH=\epsilon would give me the ideal efficiency. I got 67%
I will assume that this is an engine cycle so it goes from c to b to a back to c.

Efficiency is η = W/Qh = Qh-Qc/Qh

You cannot use η = 1 - Tc/Th because this is not a Carnot cycle.

So you have to determine Qh and either Qc or W.

Let's try to calculate heat flow in and out. We start by finding which parts of the cycle involve heat flow in and out.

Does heat flow into the gas during ba? How about ac? cb? Hint: Apply the first law.

When does heat flow OUT of the gas? (hint: again apply the first law).

Next, we have to calculate the heat flow IN and the heat flow OUT. To do this we have to know the relationship between heat flow and work or change in internal energy. Cv and Cp and ΔT are used to determine the heat flow in constant volume and constant pressure processes. For the isothermal part, does the internal energy change? So what is the relationship between heat flow and work in this part?

Finally, when you determine the Qh and Qc apply the efficiency formula to determine efficiency, η.AM
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top