Torque/Moment of inertia. Find the mass of the sphere.

AI Thread Summary
To find the mass of a sphere rotating under a torque of 25 N*m, the problem involves understanding the relationship between torque, moment of inertia, and angular acceleration. The moment of inertia for a solid sphere is given by I = (2/5)MR^2, where R is the radius. The angular displacement of 180 revolutions must be converted to radians for calculations. Using the equations for rotational motion, the mass can be derived by rearranging the torque equation to m = (2τ)/(r^2α), where α is calculated from the angular displacement and time. The final mass of the sphere is approximately 13.82 kg, assuming all calculations are correctly applied.
whatusername
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A sphere (radius = 0.60cm) can be rotated about an axis through its center by a torque of 25 N*m, which accelerates it uniformly from rest through a total angular displacement of 180 rev in a time of 15 s. What is the mass of the sphere?

Homework Equations



My textbook says that this is the formula for the [solid] sphere: I=(2/5)MR^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I don't really know what to do here, but I tried this: I=(2/5)MR^2
I = M* (2/5)(.60)^2
I = .144 m.
However, that doesn't make a lot of sense; I'm pretty sure there has to be another equation that needs to be used. I need someone to explain this to me and guide me through this process. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Think how you would do the equivalent problem in normal linear motion:

A force of 25N accelerates a block uniformly from rest to a distance of 180m in time 15s. What is the mass of the block?

Got it?

It's exactly the same, but using rotational equivalents - so instead of force you have torque, instead of mass you have moment of inertia, instead of distance you have angle.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Welcome to PF.

Think how you would do the equivalent problem in normal linear motion:

A force of 25N accelerates a block uniformly from rest to a distance of 180m in time 15s. What is the mass of the block?

Got it?

It's exactly the same, but using rotational equivalents - so instead of force you have torque, instead of mass you have moment of inertia, instead of distance you have angle.

Could you give me the formulas that I have to use? In order that they would be used. I'm confused, and the fact that it's well past midnight probably plays a big role as well [right now]. :(
 
Concentrate: what equations are associated with a constant acceleration?
 
Simon Bridge said:
Concentrate: what equations are associated with a constant acceleration?

a = change in velocity/ change in time?
 
Whenever you see the words "constant acceleration" or "uniform acceleration" you should think kinematics and you use kinematic equations... or you draw a velocity-time diagram and use grade-school geometry. (Google "constant acceleration"!)

For instance - in the linear problem in post #2:
The v-t graph is a line starting at (v,t)=(0,0) and ending at (u,15) (assign variables for everything you don't know). The acceleration is the slope of this line and the displacement is the area under it. The problem wants you to find the mass - so you find the acceleration, then use F=ma (since you are given F).

slope: a = \frac{(u-0)}{(15-0)} = \frac{u}{15} (rise over run)
area: d = 180 = \frac{15u}{2} (half base times height)

two equations, two unknowns.
you should be able to complete it from there.


The rotational form of this will be an angular velocity (ω) vs time graph, the area under the graph will be the angular displacement (θ) and the slope will be the angular acceleration (α).

Your strategy should be the same as above, but you have an extra step on the end when you convert moment of inertia (I) to mass.

It some stage you will have to stop thinking of physics problems in terms of finding the right equation and plugging in the numbers. There are way too many equations to memorize for this to work well. Instead, try to remember the physical relationships and use those to construct equations - then you only have to memorize the ones you use lots.
 
So, do I use a = change in w / change in t. Which would be 180 rev/ 15 sec = 12 rev/sec. Then, Torque = I * acceleration. ---> 25 N*m/12 rev/sec = 2.1 (what units would go here?)
And then, m = I /2/5 R^2 = 2.1/(2/5)(.60)^2 = 14.6.

does this make any sense and is there anything right here?
 
It will help you understand if you just draw the graph.

\alpha = \frac{\Delta \omega}{\Delta t} fine, but \Delta\omega \neq 180\text{revs}

I can see your confusion: you are used to thinking of the "rev" as shorthand for "revolution per second" but here you are told that this is an angular displacement of 180 revolutions.

You need to convert angles into radiens to be useful. 1.revolution = 2π.radiens
In rotating systems, distance is angle is radiens, speed is radiens per second and acceleration is radiens per second-squared.

List what you know:
\theta = 360\pi\; rad
\omega_0 = 0\; rad.s^{-1}
\tau = 25.Nm
T=\Delta t = 15 s
r=0.6 m

\omega_f = \text{?}
\alpha = \text{?}
m = \text{?}

Some useful relations:
(1) \tau = I\alpha
(2) d=v_0t+\frac{1}{2}at^2
(3) a = r\alpha
(4) I_{sphere}=\text{look it up}

I don't think I can give you any more hints without doing it for you!

What kind of school makes you work through December?
 
Last edited:
OK: Merry Xmas...

from (2): 360\pi=0+\frac{1}{2}\alpha (15)^2 \Rightarrow \alpha = (3.2)\pi \; rad.s^{-2} (why?)

from (4): I = \frac{1}{2}mr^2 (check this - look it up)

put into (1): \tau = \frac{1}{2}mr^2 \alpha\Rightarrow m = \frac{2\tau}{r^2\alpha}=\frac{2(25)}{(0.6)^2(3.2) \pi }=13.816 \; kg
 
  • #10
Hey, thanks!... I'm just more confused than I should be at this point, and especially with this problem.
 
  • #11
Cavendum doctori!
I have been known to maliciously post wrong answers to catch people out.
Check what I have written. No responsibility for advice not taken.
 
  • #12
If your help was real and correct - Thank you;
if it wasn't - then screw you and your life.
I'm not in a mood for any kind of crap right now.
Thank you very much.
 
  • #13
Btw, I did check what you wrote. Those two formulas match to the ones my professor gave me.
 
  • #14
Seriously? No wonder you get confused!
My advise is always real and always good ;) but you won't learn if you don't do some work to find things out for yourself.

What did your professor tell you the moment of inertia of a sphere is?
Remember it is against the rules for me to do your homework for you?
If you don't understand what I did, you'll get it wrong.
I think that's the best I can do. Good luck.
 
  • #15
I thought u said that u wrote the info incorrect on purpose. I know the sphere moment of inertia is 2/5mr^2. I appreciate ur help, and as I said above if it's correct than I do thank u, only if u were messing with it than (whatever I wrote). I just don't get that stuff because I haven't studied enough :(
 
  • #16
Does that sphere moment of inertia match the moment of inertia I gave you?
Should it?
 
  • #17
It doesn't, but only the fraction doesn't. But I still think that I didn't do the problem completely correct. I already handed it in.
 
  • #18
That fraction is important! I had deliberately used the I for a cylinder to make sure I wasn't doing all the work for you. Had you blindly copied what I did, you'd have deserved the lost marks: you can see that right? (But it wouldn't have been enough to fail the question.)

You still have to go to school in December? You poor thing!
In NZ, college is out in October and exams finished by November.
We don't go back till March.

Apart from that - doing exactly what I did, but with the correct fraction, and no arithmetic errors, you'd get the right answer.

Well - good luck and happy xmas.
 
Back
Top