Energy for Orbits: 500km Above Earth's Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter ice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Orbits
AI Thread Summary
To send a 1000kg object to a height of 500km above Earth's surface, approximately 4.5 billion Joules of energy is required just for lifting. However, to place the object into orbit at that height, additional energy is needed to achieve the necessary orbital velocity, which is significantly greater than the energy required for lifting alone. The discussion emphasizes that mechanical energy in orbit consists of both kinetic and potential energy, necessitating a calculation of their changes. The correct approach involves equating gravitational force with centripetal force to derive the orbital velocity. Understanding these energy requirements is crucial for accurately determining the energy needed for both lifting and orbital insertion.
ice
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This question came up on a quiz and i got it wrong.
a)how much energy does it take to send a 1000kg object from the surface of the Earth to a height of 500km above the Earth's surface? b) how much energy does it take to put the same object into ORBIT at 500km above the surface of the earth.

For part A, i got -4.5*10^9 Joules, but i don't know if that's right.
part b is what i really don't understand, so any help here would be appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part A you simply calcuated the amount of work required to lift an object to a certain height. If you simply lifted it to that height and let it go it would simply fall back to Earth. In part B, the keyword is ORBIT which means that in addition to merely lifting the object you must impart to it sufficient velocity for it to remain at that height in order for it to ORBIT the Earth. You will find that the kinetic energy requirement of orbiting is substantially greater than the requirement for simply lifting the object.
 
but isn't Ek=1/2 Ep for all orbits? i tried using v^2 = sqrt(2GM/r), which didnt really work out.
 
I think for b) it is:

<br /> ME = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 - \frac{mMG}{r}<br />


<br /> ME = \frac{mMG}{2r} - \frac{mMG}{r}<br />

The Mechanical Energy = Kinetic Energy + Potential Energy
I substituted the orbital velocity for v which equals to:

<br /> v_{orb} = \sqrt{\frac{MG}{r}}<br />

You can derive this by putting the Gravitational Force to be equal to the centripetal force.

If there are any errors - feel free to comment.
 
The part that you're leaving out is that the payload starts off on the surface of the Earth with whatever potential energy it has there and (in the simplified case) NO kinetic energy. What you need to calculate is the CHANGE in both the payload's potential energy and kinetic energy.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top