Why symplectic symmetry has N(N+1)/2 generators?

ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me this:
Why Sp(N) symmetry has N(N+1)/2 generators?(QFT of Peskin and Schroeder).
Thank you very much for your kind helping.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ndung200790 said:
Please teach me this:
Why Sp(N) symmetry has N(N+1)/2 generators?(QFT of Peskin and Schroeder).
Thank you very much for your kind helping.

A symplectic matrix is an N \times N matrix M (N must be even) that satisfies

M^T \Omega M = \Omega ,~~\Omega =\begin{pmatrix} 0 & I_{N/2} \\ -I_{N/2} & 0 \end{pmatrix},~~~(*)

where I_{I/2} is the N/2 dimensional unit matrix. In terms of a parameterization into N/2 \times N/2 matrices,

M = \begin{pmatrix} A& B \\ C & D \end{pmatrix},

(*) becomes the three equations

A^T D - C^T B = I,~~ A^T C = C^T A,~~ D^T B = B^T C.

The first of these let's us solve for, say D in terms of the other three, so it is equivalent to (N/2)^2 conditions on M. The other equations demand that A^T C and D^T B are symmetric matrices. They therefore determine half of the off-diagonal components of these objects and are each equivalent to

\frac{1}{2} \frac{N}{2}\left(\frac{N}{2} -1\right)

conditions on M.

The number of independent components of the symplectic matrix M is therefore

N^2 - \left( \frac{N}{2}\right)^2 - 2 \frac{1}{2} \frac{N}{2}\left(\frac{N}{2} -1\right) = \frac{N(N+1)}{2}.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top