Plane monochromatic wave is not physically realizable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pjbeierle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Wave
AI Thread Summary
A plane monochromatic wave, described mathematically as Ae^(i(kx-wt)), cannot represent a physical state because it is not square integrable, meaning it does not have finite energy over all space. This concept parallels optics, where a perfectly pure monochromatic plane wave theoretically extends infinitely in all directions, making it physically unrealizable. Instead, a superposition of plane waves can be square integrable and thus represent a physical state. The discussion raises questions about the implications of physical realizability in wave functions and whether any square integrable wave can truly be realized. The distinction between idealized mathematical constructs and physical realizability remains a complex topic in both quantum mechanics and optics.
pjbeierle
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am currently reading Cohen-Tannoudji's Quantum Mechanics. In the book on page 23 there is a comment that states;
"A plane wave of type Ae^i(kx-wt) , whose modulus is constant throughout all space [cf. |ψ|^2=|A|^2], is not square integrable. Therefore, rigorously,it cannot represent a physical state of the particle (in the same way as, in optics, a plane monochromatic wave is not physically realizable). On the other hand, a superposition of plane waves can be square integrable."​

My understanding of what the author is trying to get across is that a wave such as
A*cos(kx-wt) where A=1 integrating from -∞ to ∞ is not finite, fine. but I DON'T understand the optics comment that "a plane monochromatic wave is not physically realizable". I have not taken very much optics or electromagnetic theory, so I have not come across this phenomena. Can someone please explain this to me, or foward me to some reference that will describe trying to physically realize a monochromatic plane wave? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A perfectly pure monochromatic plane wave must extend to infinity in all directions. How does one physically realize such a wave?

If it does not extend to infinity in all directions, then it can be represented (via Fourier analysis) as a superposition of waves with different frequencies, and is therefore not monochromatic.
 
I'm not sure what importance the distinction really has. Is any square integrable wave function physically realizable? I'm pretty sure that no one here can name a wave function that is physically realizable, so just what that term is actually intended to imply is not so clear.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...

Similar threads

Back
Top