Parallel plate capacitor's plate distance is doubled, does the energy double?

AI Thread Summary
When the distance between the plates of a parallel-plate capacitor is doubled after being disconnected from a battery, the electric field remains unchanged, while the potential difference doubles. This results in the total energy stored in the capacitor also doubling, which raises concerns about energy conservation. The confusion arises from the assumption that energy should remain constant; however, the increase in potential energy is due to the work done in separating the plates. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationships between capacitance, charge, voltage, and energy in capacitors. Clarifying these equations can resolve the apparent contradictions in energy changes.
DerekZ10
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A parallel-plate capacitor is charged by being connected to a battery and is then disconnected from the battery. The separation between the plates is then doubled. How does the electric field change? The potential difference? The total energy? Explain your reasoning.

Homework Equations



σ=Q/A (Surface Charge Density)

E=σ/ε0 (Electric Field Between Plates)

V=Ed (Potential Difference)

U=(1/2)QV (Potential Energy)

The Attempt at a Solution



Q1=Q2

A1=A2

d1=x
d2=2x

Question 1: Electric Field Change?

E=Q/(Aε0)

No, d is not related.

Question 2: Potential Difference Change?

V=Ed

Yes, the voltage will double.

Question 3: Total Energy change?

U=(1/2)QV

Yes, it will double.


4. Hold up! That doesn't make sense!

So I have the answers, but I need someone to explain this to me because this looks to be breaking thermodynamics. The answers given is inline with what cramster and numerous other sources have said. I think the new capacitor will allow it to store twice the charge, but the problem makes it seem like the energy is just created. Or am I suppose to be assuming that by moving the plates farther apart, the capacitor is converting the physical motion energy into electrical energy?

My logic is telling me the final total energy should be the same as the initial. And that the electric field should have been halved. But I don't have an equation available for electric field intensity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DerekZ10 said:

Homework Statement



A parallel-plate capacitor is charged by being connected to a battery and is then disconnected from the battery. The separation between the plates is then doubled. How does the electric field change? The potential difference? The total energy? Explain your reasoning.

Homework Equations



σ=Q/A (Surface Charge Density)

E=σ/ε0 (Electric Field Between Plates)

V=Ed (Potential Difference)

U=(1/2)QV (Potential Energy)

The Attempt at a Solution



Q1=Q2

A1=A2

d1=x
d2=2x

Question 1: Electric Field Change?

E=Q/(Aε0)

No, d is not related.

Question 2: Potential Difference Change?

V=Ed

Yes, the voltage will double.

Question 3: Total Energy change?

U=(1/2)QV

Yes, it will double.


4. Hold up! That doesn't make sense!

So I have the answers, but I need someone to explain this to me because this looks to be breaking thermodynamics. The answers given is inline with what cramster and numerous other sources have said. I think the new capacitor will allow it to store twice the charge, but the problem makes it seem like the energy is just created. Or am I suppose to be assuming that by moving the plates farther apart, the capacitor is converting the physical motion energy into electrical energy?

My logic is telling me the final total energy should be the same as the initial. And that the electric field should have been halved. But I don't have an equation available for electric field intensity.

Welcome to the PF.

It looks like you are missing two key equations. The first relates the capacitance to the palte area A and separation distance d. Are you familiar with that equation?

The second equation relates the charge Q to the capacitance C and the voltage between the plates V. Are you familiar with that equation?

Does using those two equations make this easier for you?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top