Centrifugal Force and the Path of a Moving Particle in a Rotating Tube

AI Thread Summary
A particle projected towards the axis of a rotating tube experiences an inertial force due to centrifugal force, described by the equation m\ddot r = mrω². The discussion focuses on deriving the particle's path using Newton's second law, leading to the differential equation \ddot r = ω²r. By multiplying this equation by the radial velocity \dot r and integrating, the relationship \frac{1}{2}(\dot r)² = \frac{1}{2}ω²r² + c is established. The integration process is clarified as a formal procedure involving the manipulation of differential equations. Understanding this method is emphasized as it is frequently applicable in similar problems.
azizlwl
Messages
1,066
Reaction score
10
"Centrifugal force"

Homework Statement



A smooth horizontal tube of length l rotates about a vertical axis. A particle placed at the extreme end of the tube is projected towards O(axis) with a velocity while at the same time the tube rotates about the axis with constant angular speed ω. Determine the path.

Solution
The only force on the particle is the inertial force("Centrifugal force") mrω2

Newton's second law becomes
m\ddot r=0+mrw^2 \ or \ \ddot r=ω^2r

This part I don't understand
Multiplying\ by\ \dot r dt=dr \ \ and\ integrating

\frac {1}{2}\int d(\dot r)^2=w^2 \int rdr
\frac {1}{2}(\dot r)^2=\frac {1}{2}w^2 r^2 + c

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Blurr at differential equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The (radial) velocity is the time derivative of r: \dot r= dr/dt
You can multiply the equation \ddot r= \omega^2 r by \dot r and you get \ddot r \dot r = \omega^2 r \dot r. The left hand side is the time derivative of (\dot r)^2 /2, the right hand side is the time derivative of \omega^2 r ^2 /2. So integrating both sides of the equation leads to \frac {1}{2}(\dot r)^2=\frac {1}{2}w^2 r^2 + c .

The formal procedure is that the equation \ddot r \dot r = \omega^2 r \dot r is written as \dot r d\dot r/dt = \omega^2 r dr/dt and multiplied by dt and then putting integral signs in front of both sides:
\int{\ddot r d \dot r}= \int{\omega^2 r dr}

ehild
 


ehild said:
] .

The formal procedure is that the equation \ddot r \dot r = \omega^2 r \dot r is written as \dot r d\dot r/dt = \omega^2 r dr/dt and multiplied by dt and then putting integral signs in front of both sides:
\int{\ddot r d \dot r}= \int{\omega^2 r dr}

ehild

The formal method you mentioned is easier for me to understand.
Thank you
 


OK. Remember that procedure, it is applied quite often.

ehild
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top