How Do You Decompose a Random n-Cycle into 2-Cycles?

AI Thread Summary
Decomposing a random n-cycle into 2-cycles involves breaking down the cycle into pairs that represent the transitions between elements. For example, the cycle (abc) can be expressed as the product of 2-cycles (ab)(ac), indicating that 'a' transitions to 'b' and then to 'c'. This technique can be extended to longer cycles, such as (abcd), which can be represented as (ab)(ac)(ad). Understanding this decomposition helps in analyzing permutations in group theory. The method effectively simplifies the representation of complex cycles into manageable components.
frb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
can anyone explain me the technique to decompose a random n-cycle into a bucnh of 2 cycles. Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Look at: (ab)(ac). Approaching this from the left, we have (1) a goes to b. (2) b goes to a in cycle one, and then a goes to c in cycle two. (3) As for c it is sent into a, cycle two.

Thus (abc)=(ab)(ac). And so forth, (abcd) = (ab)(ac)(ad), etc.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top