Exploring Newton's Equations of Motion in Different Coordinate Systems

AI Thread Summary
Newton's equations of motion can be expressed in different coordinate systems, including Cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical coordinates, with the fundamental relationship being F=ma. The key is to accurately express the components of force (F) and acceleration (a) in the chosen coordinate system. While the basic law remains the same, the representation of these components varies, requiring a good understanding of the respective coordinates. For specific forms, resources can be found online that detail the components of acceleration in spherical coordinates, which can then be matched with the corresponding force components. Ultimately, mastering these conversions allows for a comprehensive application of Newton's laws across different contexts.
M. next
Messages
380
Reaction score
0
What are the Newton's equations of motion of a single particle (using cartesian, cylindrical, and spherical coordinates)?

I know the first: F=ma (Along x, y, z) But the in other coordinates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you learn about "vectors", you will find that F=ma, written in vector form, is the correct expression for the law in any of those coordinates. You end up just needing to know how to express the components of F and a (the two vectors there) in those different coordinate systems, which is kind of a detail-- it sounds like you really only want the law, and the point of vectors is to able to write the law in just one way. One-stop shopping! The forms for the components in the different coordinates is probably best to just look up, I'll bet a google with the appropriate words would succeed easily. (F is easy, if you understand the coordinates, but a is a bit trickier.)
 
I just need the last form, the final one, so I can see if I reached the same form using Hamilton's Equation. I googled before posting this, I got nothing.
 
Well, all I did was google "acceleration in spherical coordinates", and the first hit was http://www.csupomona.edu/~ajm/materials/delsph.pdf , so if you scroll down to "velocity and acceleration" you find the general form for acceleration in spherical coordinates. Then just match up the force components (radial, latitudinal, longitudinal) which should be easy enough if you know what force you are dealing with, and you have F=ma in component form in spherical coordinates.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you Ken G.
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top