Greater Knowledge = More Evidence for Design?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the complexity of bacterial motors and how advancements in technology reveal intricate biological systems. One participant argues that increased knowledge suggests evidence for intelligent design rather than random chance. However, counterarguments emphasize that there is no empirical evidence supporting the idea of design, and the existence of complex structures does not negate their evolutionary origins. It is noted that extensive research exists on the evolution of bacterial flagella, reinforcing the view that creationism and intelligent design lack scientific validity and should not be part of scientific discourse. Links to resources debunking creationist claims and providing information on evolution are shared for further reading.
mram10
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Greater Knowledge = More Evidence for Design??

I was studying bacteria. With better technology we have been able to determine that bacteria have an extremely detailed motor that allows for transportation. It is equivalent to a human swimming thru thick grease at 60 miles an hour. It baffled my mind thinking that the more information we find ... the more complex things turned out to be, it seems more evidence for a design rather than a chance. Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly you can't have "more evidence" because there is no evidence for design. Secondly even if there was no explanation for the evolution of a structure that does not mean it did not evolve nor does this count as evidence for other hypotheses. Thirdly there has been plenty of research on flagellum evolution. Lastly creationism/intelligent design is not science and has no place on this science forum, https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=593815.
 

Thread 'Status Update by JRMichler'

Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
View full post »
Thread 'In the early days of electricity, they didn't have wall plugs'

Thread 'In the early days of electricity, they didn't have wall plugs'

Hello scientists, engineers, etc. I have not had any questions for you recently, so have not participated here. I was scanning some material and ran across these 2 ads. I had posted them at another forum, and I thought you may be interested in them as well. History is fascinating stuff! Some houses may have had plugs, but many homes just screwed the appliance into the light socket overhead. Does anyone know when electric wall plugs were in widespread use? 1906 ad DDTJRAC Even big...
View full post »

Similar threads

Discussion on the science-literature relationship and more
Replies
14
Views
3K
The Myth Of Empirical Knowledge, Data, Evidence
Replies
5
Views
14K
I could really use some help picking my optional module [GameDev]
Replies
2
Views
2K
News Post-Scientific Technocratic Methodologies
Replies
12
Views
3K
Is Doing More Always Better for Society?
Replies
4
Views
2K
The rise and fall of evidence-based natural philosophy.
Replies
18
Views
4K
I Adding random numbers: Tolerance analysis
Replies
11
Views
3K
Reusability of nuts and tapped holes + Choosing the right material
Replies
3
Views
2K
The Grand Design and other Explanations without Explanation
Replies
6
Views
4K
Rejecting Intelligent Design: A High Schooler's Arguments
Replies
28
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top