Taking the integral of a series

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guidenable
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Sum
Guidenable
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the exact sum of:

\sum 2/(n7n)

n=1->∞

The Attempt at a Solution



Let Sn denote the nth partial sum.

ln(Sn) = \Sigma ln(2/(n7n))

=\Sigma ln2 - lnn - nln7

= nln2 - (ln1 + ln7 + ln2 + 2ln7 + ln3 + 3ln7 ...)
= nln2 - ln(n!) - ln7\Sigma n
= ln (2n)/n! - ln7 (\Sigma n)

I'm not sure where to go from here, or if I'm even going in the right direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how these two power series relate to each other?
\sum z^{n-1}
\sum \frac{1}{n} z^n
 
No, but now I intend to find out. A hint would be appreciated though.
 
Never mind. Those two series are related by a factor of 1/zn. I should have looked a bit closer :/.
 
Hint: \int z^{n-1} dz = \frac{1}{n} z^n
 
Guidenable said:

Homework Statement


Find the exact sum of:

\sum 2/(n7n)

n=1->∞

The Attempt at a Solution



Let Sn denote the nth partial sum.

ln(Sn) = \Sigma ln(2/(n7n))

=\Sigma ln2 - lnn - nln7

= nln2 - (ln1 + ln7 + ln2 + 2ln7 + ln3 + 3ln7 ...)
= nln2 - ln(n!) - ln7\Sigma n
= ln (2n)/n! - ln7 (\Sigma n)

I'm not sure where to go from here, or if I'm even going in the right direction.
This approach won't work because the very first step is wrong. It's not true that ln(a+b) = ln a + ln b.
 
Guidenable said:

Homework Statement


Find the exact sum of:

\sum 2/(n7n)

n=1->∞

The Attempt at a Solution



Let Sn denote the nth partial sum.

ln(Sn) = \Sigma ln(2/(n7n))

=\Sigma ln2 - lnn - nln7

= nln2 - (ln1 + ln7 + ln2 + 2ln7 + ln3 + 3ln7 ...)
= nln2 - ln(n!) - ln7\Sigma n
= ln (2n)/n! - ln7 (\Sigma n)

I'm not sure where to go from here, or if I'm even going in the right direction.

Stop right there. What you have done is invalid: the log of a sum is not the sum of the logs. For example, if you claim that log(2 + 3) = log(2) + log(3) you would have log(2) + log(3) = log(2*3) = 6 (because the log of a product is the sum of the logs), so your method would give log(5) = log(6), hence 5 = 6.

RGV
 
Thanks for the correction, I normally know log rules, just that one slipped. You guys mean bringing the log into the sum, right?
 
jbunniii said:
Hint: \int z^{n-1} dz = \frac{1}{n} z^n

So I just evaluate the integral?
 
  • #10
Guidenable said:
So I just evaluate the integral?
Yes, do you see how this can be applied to this problem?
 
  • #11
Guidenable said:
Thanks for the correction, I normally know log rules, just that one slipped. You guys mean bringing the log into the sum, right?

I thought that was what I said.

RGV
 
  • #12
jbunniii said:
Yes, do you see how this can be applied to this problem?

Yes, I understand now, thank you very much!
 
  • #13
jbunniii said:
Yes, do you see how this can be applied to this problem?

Hey I was just wondering how you can take the integral of a series to find the sum? Don't series only include integers and will not add up to the same thing as a integral? For example my calculus textbook says when doing the integral test specifically states that the integral is not the sum of the series. Can someone please tell me what I am missing? Thank you.
 
  • #14
Eats Dirt said:
Hey I was just wondering how you can take the integral of a series to find the sum? Don't series only include integers and will not add up to the same thing as a integral? For example my calculus textbook says when doing the integral test specifically states that the integral is not the sum of the series. Can someone please tell me what I am missing? Thank you.

If
f(z) = \sum a_n z^n
then, under certain conditions, you can perform manipulations like this:
\int f(z) dz = \int \sum a_n z^n dz = \sum \int a_n z^n dz = \sum \frac{a_n}{n+1} z^{n+1} dz
You need to provide justification for interchanging the order of integration and summation. Uniform convergence of the power series is a sufficient condition.

This kind of trick is useful for finding sums such as \sum (a_n / n) z^n, provided you have a closed-form expression for \sum a_n z^n. Term by term differentiation of the power series can also be useful in some situations.
 
  • #15
Eats Dirt said:
Hey I was just wondering how you can take the integral of a series to find the sum? Don't series only include integers and will not add up to the same thing as a integral? For example my calculus textbook says when doing the integral test specifically states that the integral is not the sum of the series. Can someone please tell me what I am missing? Thank you.
The idea here is to recognize that some fairly well-known power series in x (or z as jbunniii seems to like) is involved here, and that this power series represents a function of x. Then plug-in a value for x which gives the series of interest in this problem.
 
Back
Top