Analyzing Equilibrium Forces Using Spring Balances: A Practical Experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on resolving forces in an equilibrium experiment using spring balances, specifically filling out a force equilibrium table. Participants clarify how to establish an X-Y coordinate system and resolve the forces into their X and Y components based on given angles and magnitudes. For the 30-degree angle, the components are calculated, and the importance of ensuring that the sum of the components equals zero for equilibrium is emphasized. The user is encouraged to apply the same method for a second set of data at 50 degrees. The conversation highlights the need for careful measurement and understanding of force components to validate the experiment's equilibrium condition.
aek
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
im having trouble filling in a table similar to this:

FORCE X COMPONENT (N) Y COMPONENT (N)
F1
F2
F3
SUM

these are the results:
when angle is 30 degrees
f1 =0.5N
f2 = 0.5N
f3 = 1.0N
when angle is 50 degrees
f1=1.6N
f2=1.3N
f3=1.4N

I used approx 100 grams on each vector. there is a diagram also i placed for added detail, the rectangles are the spring balances

and finally how do i prove it is a equillibrium and the expected magnitude and direction of the next force?

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • untitled.GIF
    untitled.GIF
    3.5 KB · Views: 500
Physics news on Phys.org
In the drawing, F1 is shown perfectly vertical, and F2 is shown perfectly horizontal. How was this maintained (or obtained) during the experiment?? (Or did these angles change when force F3 was applied??)
Also, what and where were the "100 gram" objects??


~~
 
well this experiment was conducted on table and the weights were laying the table connected to the spring balances. the 3 forces stood even throughout the experiment..xanthym? do you think you can help me please?
 
To complete your "Force Equilibrium Table", you need to establish an X-Y coordinate system for your experimental setup. Referencing your drawing, a natural choice might be:
X-axis ---> horizontal line thru center, with (+) direction to the RIGHT
Y-axis ---> vertical line thru center, with (+) direction UP
Now you can resolve your forces into X & Y components, with components having the following signs:
Force component pulling RIGHT ---> (+)X
Force component pulling LEFT ---> (-)X
Force component pulling UP ---> (+)Y
Force component pulling DOWN ---> (-)Y

If all forces are in equilibrium, all the X-components will add to zero AND all the Y-components will add to 0.

For instance, for your first data set:
when angle is 30 degrees
f1 =0.5N
f2 = 0.5N
f3 = 1.0N
Force "f1" would be listed in the "Y Component" column with (-0.5 N) because it is pulling DOWN. Force "f2" would be listed in the "X Component" column with (-0.5 N) because it is pulling LEFT. Force f3 would have 2 listings because it is pulling at an angle and has both an X-component & Y-component: #1) (1.0N)*cos(30 deg)=(+0.866 N) in the "X Component" column because that component is pulling RIGHT, and #2) (1.0N)*sin(30 deg)=(+0.5 N) in the "Y-Component" column because that component is pulling UP. All the force components in the "X Component" column AND all the force components in the "Y Component" column should add to 0. (If they don't, there is some "experimental error" in your experiment.)

...X Component...Y Component
f1...0......-0.5
f2....-0.5......0
f3...+0.866......+0.5
SUM...+0.366......0.0 <--- Add each col. (This row should have 0's)

If you understand the above, you should be able to complete the Table for the 50 degree case. (A totally new Table is started for this next case.)
when angle is 50 degrees
f1=1.6N
f2=1.3N
f3=1.4N


Try it and see what results you get.


~~
 
Last edited:
THANKS A MILLION, if there's anything i can do in return please don't hesitate. Thanks again.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top