Space-Time Invariance, Weird Names and Some Questions

RadiantL
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hi, so I was going over my lectures notes and I was looking at the Invariance, S2 for space time.

I was just wondering why they call it time-like for S2<0 and space-like for S2>0 because,

S2>0 says that there is an inertial frame where events occur at the same time (this has to do with time, why call it space like?)

and

S2<0 says that there is an inertial frame where events occur at the same position
(this has to do with space, why call it time like?)

So yeah, why the weird naming?

Also I was wondering, according to my notes it says when events are time like they can be connected by a signal slower then light, and could be causal.

So can there be events where they can be connected by a signal and not be causal? ... And in S.R, when books say causal, they mean an event causes another right?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Timelike and spacelike refer to the intervals or directions. If two events happen at the same time, then all the stuff between them is only space. If two events happen at the same position, then the only stuff between them is time.

Yes, causal means that an event causes another. Sometimes we expand the word a bit to say that one event could influence another (as opposed to that influence being impossible, as it is if two events are spacelike separated).

This should also help you understand timelike intervals. An object that follows a timelike trajectory or goes along an interval is basically going forward in time like you'd expect most things would, so any point in spacetime that object can reach by timelike trajectories is within its region of influence--a region that extends forward in time and through space. This region is called a light cone because in some diagrams, people put the x and y axes in a plane and the t axis perpendicular, and the region takes on a cone shape. Lightlike trajectories define the boundary of the cone, and everything between them is a possible path for most ordinary objects.
 
The proper term is "spacetime interval" which is an invariant (does not depend on the reference frame) for the interval between two events. If it is time-like, that means that you could measure the interval with an inertial clock present at the two events. If it is space-like, that means that you could measure the interval with an inertial ruler that is present at the two events. If it is light-like, that means you cannot measure the interval. The interval between any two events falls into one of those three types.
 
Thanks Murphid and ghwellsjr, really cleared things up :)
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top