Wave Function Doubt and Derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the correct form of the wave function in the Schrödinger equation, with two competing expressions presented: one with a negative exponent and one with a positive exponent. Participants emphasize the importance of substituting both forms into the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation (1DSE) to identify the valid solution. There is also a focus on the derivation of the wave function using trigonometric forms and Euler's formula, leading to questions about the necessity of complex components in wave functions. The consensus is that wave functions are generally complex, which is essential for proper integration in quantum mechanics. Understanding this complexity is crucial for grasping the nature of quantum wave functions.
sarvesh0303
Messages
61
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



I was reading up on the Wave Function used in the Schrodinger Wave Equation. However one source said that
ψ(x,t)=e^(-i/hbar*(px-Et))
Another source had this
ψ(x,t)=e^(i/hbar*(px-Et))

Which one of these is true and could someone give a derivation for the correct wavefunction?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can see for yourself by substituting into the 1DSE.
In fact - that is an important exercise: do that and get back to us.
 
I know I can! But I want to try deriving the 1DSE by using this value. So I want to know another way of deriving it. I read that it can be derived by taking
ψ(x,t)=A(cos(2∏x/λ-2∏ηt)+isin(2∏x/λ-2∏ηt))

where η=frequency
and then the euler formula was used.

My doubt with this derivation is that would every wave (its wavefunction) always be of the form mentioned above.
If so then since isin(2∏x/λ-2∏ηt) is a complex term, then wouldn't it imply that every wave must have a complex component?
This part really confuses me!
 
sarvesh0303 said:
I know I can! But I want to try deriving the 1DSE by using this value.
The 1DSE is not really something you derive is it? You will benefit by substituting both forms of the wavefunction you were asking about into the Schrodinger equation to see which one is the "real" solution. Have you tried this yet? If not - do it. If you have, please report what you found.
So I want to know another way of deriving it.
"it" what? The wavefunction for a free particle or the 1DSE? You have mentioned trying to derive both now.
My doubt with this derivation is that would every wave (its wavefunction) always be of the form mentioned above.
If so then since isin(2∏x/λ-2∏ηt) is a complex term, then wouldn't it imply that every wave must have a complex component?
This part really confuses me!
In general, wave-functions are complex - this is correct. Why would this confuse you? It is why you have to premultiply by the complex conjugate before integrating.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top