Prove the BAC CAB Rule: Ax(BxC)=B(A.C)-C(A.B)

  • Thread starter Thread starter shaiqbashir
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the BAC CAB Rule, which is expressed as Ax(BxC)=B(A.C)-C(A.B). This involves vector cross products and their components, situated within the context of vector algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss verifying the equation by examining its components individually. There are suggestions to rewrite components and explore symmetry arguments. Some participants seek clarification on specific steps and details in the reasoning process.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various approaches to the proof. Some have offered detailed breakdowns of the components involved, while others are asking for further clarification on specific steps. There is a mix of exploration and requests for deeper understanding without a clear consensus on the proof itself.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of vector components and their relationships, with some expressing uncertainty about specific parts of the proof. There is an emphasis on understanding rather than simply arriving at a solution.

shaiqbashir
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Hi!

Please can u prove the following rule!

Ax(BxC)=B(A.C)-C(A.B)

this is usually remembered as "BAC CAB Rule"

i just couldn't solve this question.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tedious, but straightforward is just writing out the components.
Try verifying the equation one component a time.
For example, the x-component of A X (B X C) is:

A_y(B_xC_y-B_yC_x)-A_z(B_zC_x-B_xC_z)
, which can be rewritten as:
B_x(A_yC_y+A_zC_z)-C_x(A_yB_y+A_zB_z)

you almost have the x component of B(AC) in the left term and the x-component of C(AB) in the right term. They both miss the same term B_x(A_xC_x) so you can just add it to both terms, since they will cancel. This establishes the relation for the x-component. Do the same for the other two (or try to be smart and use some symmetry argument).
 
Well thanks for ur reply but can u please tell me in some more detail so that i can understand it more properly!

Thanks!
 
I`m not sure which part is unclear to you.

What I meant was:
Ax(BxC)=B(A.C)-C(A.B)
is true if and only if all three components for the vector on the left and on the right are equal. Equating one component a time makes it less cluttery.

Let:
\vec A = A_x \vec i + A_y \vec j + A_z \vec k
\vec B = B_x \vec i + B_y \vec j + B_z \vec k
\vec C = C_x \vec i + C_y \vec j + C_z \vec k

Let D = B x C:
The expression for B x C is:
\vec D = (B_yC_z-B_zC_y)\vec i + (B_zC_x-B_xC_z)\vec j +(B_xC_y-B_yC_x)\vec k
The x-component of A x D is:
A_yD_z-A_yD_x
The components of D can be gotten from the expression from B x C, so:

(\vec A \times \vec D)_x = A_yD_z-A_zD_y=A_y(B_xC_y-B_yC_x)-A_z(B_zC_x-B_xC_z)
=B_x(A_yC_y+A_zC_z)-C_x(A_yB_y+A_zB_z)=
B_x(A_xC_x+A_yC_y+A_zC_z)-C_x(A_xB_x+A_yB_y+A_zB_z)=\left[\vec B (\vec A \cdot \vec C)-\vec C(\vec A \cdot \vec B)\right]_x
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jamison Lahman
I think using euclidean tensors is the elegant way to do it...

Daniel.
 
Thank u very much Galileo but would u please explain ur last step for me that how u convert the 2nd last step to the last step.
PLzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Thanks a lot again
 
Why don't YOU try working out the calculation yourself and see what you get?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K