Is g(x)=5^sqrt(x) an Exponential Function?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the function g(x) = 5^sqrt(x) qualifies as an exponential function, defined as f(x) = ab^x. While g(x) resembles an exponential graph for x > 0, it is not continuous across all real numbers. The analysis suggests that for g(x) to match the form of an exponential function, it must satisfy specific conditions at key points, leading to the conclusion that g(0) = 1 and g(1) = 5. Ultimately, the graph of g(x) does not align with the standard exponential function f(x) = 5^x. Therefore, g(x) is not classified as an exponential function.
drewfstr314
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Our textbook defines an exponential function as
f(x) = ab^x. However, a question was brought up about a function, g(x) = 5^sqrt(x). Is g an exponential function? It looks like an exponential graph for x>0, but is not continuous on R.

Thanks in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A function is not defined in the absence of domain and range. So do tell us the whole definition as worded by your book.
 
drewfstr314 said:
Our textbook defines an exponential function as
f(x) = ab^x. However, a question was brought up about a function, g(x) = 5^sqrt(x). Is g an exponential function? It looks like an exponential graph for x>0, but is not continuous on R.

Let us ignore the fact that g(x) = 5^sqrt(x) is not always real-valued for negative x and ask the somewhat better defined question:

"Does the graph of g(x) = 5^sqrt(x) match the graph of any function f(x) of the form ab^x for real-valued constants a and b and positive real x"

One simple-minded way to answer this would be to assume that there is such a function and realize that, if so:

f(0) = a*b^0 = a = g(0) = 5^sqrt(0) = 1

So a = 1

f(1) = a*b^1 = ab = b = g(1) = 5^sqrt(1) = 5

So b = 5

So the question then becomes:

"does the graph of g(x) = 5^sqrt(x) match the graph of f(x) = 5^x"

The answer to that question is rather obvious.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top