Intro Physics Physics for Scientists and Engineers by Serway and Jewett

  • Thread starter Thread starter micromass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
"Physics for Scientists and Engineers" by Serway and Jewett is noted for its systematic problem-solving methodology, but it is criticized for its lack of thorough explanations and high difficulty level, which may not suit all students. Many users feel that the book assumes a stronger mathematical background than is common among beginners, leading to challenges in understanding the material. While it provides clear derivations and emphasizes accuracy, some argue that this focus can hinder conceptual understanding, particularly in complex topics like friction. The book is considered useful for supplementary problems, but many recommend against using it as a primary study guide due to its excessive complexity and reliance on advanced calculus. Overall, while it has strengths, the book's shortcomings in clarity and accessibility have led to mixed reviews.

For those who have used this book


  • Total voters
    22
Physics news on Phys.org
I am using this book for my intro physics series. I think it doesn't give a thorough explanation, such that after you have read it, you probably won't feel comfortable enough to tackle the ''intermediate'' difficulty problems, and certainly no chance to solve the ''challenge'' problems. They could get rid of the unimportant sections to be able to expand on ideas and give a thorough explanation is a more plain speech, rather than technical gobble-di-goo and doing a few derivations of equations, but reach into the heart and soul of physics so there is a better conceptual understanding.

Don't buy the newer editions, they are significantly more expensive for the same product basically
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The great point in this book is that it provides systematic methodology of solving problems. The course and everything is explained in a way that helps, at the end, to solve related problems. Its examples are relatively not easy. This book is straight, it gets directly to the point. The derivations are little compared to some other textbooks, but when provided, they are clear. This book insists on the accuracy of the provided knowledge which makes the reader avoids much of common mistakes, say for instance, the emphasis that the displacement when computing the work is of the "point of application of the force" and not necessarily of the object; however, sometimes accuracy hurts specifically when dealing with friction; in such situations modelling is very helpful rather than dealing with it at the atomic and molecular level.

The problem with this book is that its level is relatively high; it assumes the mathematical background higher than what many students really have. It also skips some steps in the derivations and solved examples considering them easy enough which is not the case in many situations.
 
My school uses this text, noticed it skimming through. Figured I'd post a short review.

The subjects are explained in minimal detail, while the problem sections are rather large. Often, the problems will be far too difficult for a beginner. The solution manual is almost a necessity. I don't think I prefer this text as a primary study guide, however it gets the job done. This is a good book if you're looking for supplementary problems to work.
 
Like similar level math and science texts, this book suffers from excessive use of color, way too many problems, way too many examples and applications, and new editions that come out way too often.

Beyond that, however, it is a great book. I have skimmed through quite a few of these books (halliday resnick, giancoli, tipler) and I can say that this is one of the best; the explanations are clear and the problems are very good, they require you to think and problem-solve. Other books tend to be very computational. Like others have said, the level is a bit high; you need to know your calculus.
 
This book is so atrociously bad I don't even know where to begin. No offense to people who appreciate this text but the equations are practically smashed in your face. I am looking at the rotation/angular momentum chapter (10) of the 7th ed. and there is absolutely no proof-development for formulas, the gorgeous graphics either address the topic(s) myopically or are flat-out pointless and every single problem in the book is approached on a plug-and-play formula basis. I am ashamed to claim I even own this excuse for a text.

Sorry for the harsh review but I take this subject seriously and this book seriously offends me.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
This is part 2 of my thread Collection of Free Online Math Books and Lecture Notes Here, we will consider physics and mathematical methods for physics resources. Now, this is a work in progress. Please feel free comment regarding items you want to be included, or if a link is broken etc. Note: I will not post links to other collections, each link will point you to a single item. :book:📚📒 [FONT=trebuchet ms]Introductory college/university physics College Physics, Openstax...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Back
Top