Show that the system has no closed orbits by finding a Lyapunov

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
Show that the system has no closed orbits by finding a Lyapunov ...

Homework Statement



I'm at the point in the problem where I need constants a and b satisfying

ax2(y-x3) + by2(-x-y3) < 0
and ax2+bx2 > 0

for all (x,y)≠(0,0).

Homework Equations



Just in case you're wondering, this is to satisfy the V(x,y)=ax2+by2 > 0 and ΔV(x,y)•<y-x3, -x-y3> < 0 so I can apply that one theorem to my problem.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, it seems reasonable to choose a,b>0 to ensure ax2+bx2 > 0, but I'm having trouble figuring out how to make ax2(y-x3) + by2(-x-y3) < 0 simultaneously.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


For x=y, this can be simplified to ##(a-b)x^3 - (a+b)x^5 <0 ##, which cannot be true both for positive and negative small x.
 


Jamin2112 said:

Homework Statement



I'm at the point in the problem where I need constants a and b satisfying

ax2(y-x3) + by2(-x-y3) < 0
and ax2+bx2 > 0

for all (x,y)≠(0,0).

You won't be able to do that: on the assumption that V = ax^2 + by^2 and \dot V = ax^2(y - x^3) - by^2(x + y^3) your system is
<br /> \dot x = \textstyle\frac12 x(y - x^3) \\<br /> \dot y = -\textstyle\frac12 y(x + y^3).<br />
The fixed point at the origin is some kind of non-hyperbolic saddle: x = 0 and y = 0 are invariant. On x = 0, \dot y &lt; 0 for y \neq 0 and on y = 0, \dot x &lt; 0 for x \neq 0. Thus there are points arbitrarily close to the origin where motion is unambiguously away from the origin, and at these points \dot V &gt; 0.

However, you now know that no periodic orbit can cross the coordinate axes, so the origin cannot be inside a periodic orbit. Since the origin is the only fixed point (any other fixed point must satisfy x^8 = -1), there can be no periodic orbits (because in a 2D system every periodic orbit must enclose at least one fixed point).
 
Back
Top