Resistors in parallel and series

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the configuration of resistors in a circuit, specifically how to analyze resistors in parallel and series. The user seeks clarification on the disappearance of a wire when combining a 30-ohm and a 45-ohm resistor in parallel. Responses emphasize the importance of correctly identifying connection points in the circuit diagram to justify replacing the resistors with their equivalent. It is suggested to label the corners of the rectangle containing the resistors to clarify their relationship. Overall, the conversation aims to resolve confusion regarding circuit representation and resistor combinations.
ehabmozart
Messages
212
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If an ohmmeter is connected between points and in each of the circuits shown in the figure . For the circuit a) what will it read? For the circuit b) what will it read?

http://s3.amazonaws.com/answer-board-image/b299a065-5dff-4564-82e0-d1db1c9c2c88.jpeg

Homework Equations



Series and Parallel rules

The Attempt at a Solution



I need help just in part b. Now, when we combine the 30 and 45 resistors, the solution manual combines them in parallel and the equivillant is drawn on the bottom line. My question is WHERE DID THE WIRE IN THE MIDDLE GO? Did it miraculously dissapear?... I need tips in knowing how to determine parallel in series.. ? Thanks for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What middle wire? Unless the wires (and the connections) are labeled, we'll have a difficult time discussing them.

In any case, if you can pick two points and redraw the wires such that the 30 and 45 resistors are in parallel between them (and you can), then you are justified in replacing them with the equivalent.
 
Doc Al said:
What middle wire? Unless the wires (and the connections) are labeled, we'll have a difficult time discussing them.

In any case, if you can pick two points and redraw the wires such that the 30 and 45 resistors are in parallel between them (and you can), then you are justified in replacing them with the equivalent.

I mean here the wire at which the 30 ohm resistor is placed. When drawn equivilantly with the 45 ohm resistor, they put them on the very bottom line and take off the wire which the 30 ohm resistor was originally placed at!
 
ehabmozart said:
I mean here the wire at which the 30 ohm resistor is placed. When drawn equivilantly with the 45 ohm resistor, they put them on the very bottom line and take off the wire which the 30 ohm resistor was originally placed at!
Still not clear where the problem is.

In your diagram, look at the rectangle that contains the two resistors. Label the corners a, b, c, d, starting with the upper left and going clockwise. Would you not agree that a,b, and c are essentially the same point? And thus between that point and point d, the two resistors are in parallel.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top