Electric field inside PN junction in equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the electric field behavior in a PN junction at equilibrium. It clarifies that the electric field is effectively zero at points far from the junction, such as x < -b, due to the cancellation of forces from positive and negative ions. As one approaches the depletion region, the electric field increases because the forces from the ions become unbalanced, particularly at the interface between the p and n regions. The concept of the space charge region being thin and resembling a dipole is also highlighted to explain the electric field's behavior. Overall, the participants seek clarity on how these electric fields interact and change across the junction.
anhnha
Messages
179
Reaction score
1
I need help to understand this solution:
attachment.php?attachmentid=59361&stc=1&d=1370665607.jpg

attachment.php?attachmentid=59362&stc=1&d=1370665607.jpg

Why electric field is zero at x < - b?
I think it should be non-zero because the electric field from positive and negative ions don't completely cancel each other.
How can you know E rises as x approaches zero?
 

Attachments

  • PN junction solution.JPG
    PN junction solution.JPG
    38.7 KB · Views: 607
  • PN junction.JPG
    PN junction.JPG
    21.6 KB · Views: 725
Physics news on Phys.org
anhnha said:
Why electric field is zero at x < - b?

I think it should be non-zero because the electric field from positive and negative ions don't completely cancel each other.
It is only a schematic plot. The electric field is not zero just at the boundary of the depletion region. (And the boundary of the depletion region is not sharp, either). But it tends to zero quite fast, as the forces from the positive and negative regions tend to cancel.

anhnha said:
How can you know E rises as x approaches zero?

Imagine you are a positively charged particle. You walk into the depletion region from left, from the n part. When you are inside the depletion region, still in the n part, there are some positive ions both behind you (pushing you forward) and the other positive ions in front of you, pushing you backwards. But all the negative ions on the other side pull you forward. When you are exactly at the interface between the p and n region, (x=0) all the positive ions are behind you, pushing forward and all the negative ions are in front of you, pulling you forward.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Imagine you are a positively charged particle. You walk into the depletion region from left, from the n part. When you are inside the depletion region, still in the n part, there are some positive ions both behind you (pushing you forward) and the other positive ions in front of you, pushing you backwards. But all the negative ions on the other side pull you forward. When you are exactly at the interface between the p and n region, (x=0) all the positive ions are behind you, pushing forward and all the negative ions are in front of you, pulling you forward.
Thanks, the example is great!
t is only a schematic plot. The electric field is not zero just at the boundary of the depletion region. (And the boundary of the depletion region is not sharp, either). But it tends to zero quite fast, as the forces from the positive and negative regions tend to cancel.

I am not quite understand it. Can you explain it more detail?
 
anhnha said:
Thanks, the example is great!


I am not quite understand it. Can you explain it more detail?

The space charge region around the p-n junction is quite thin, the positive and negative "poles" are close, the electric field is similar to that of a dipole, q and -q charges d distance apart. At far away from the junction, in the line of the dipole at distance x , the electric field is E=kq/(x-d/2)-q(x+d/2)≈2kq/x3.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks, got it now!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top