How Does Angular Speed Change When Skaters Connect by a Pole?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the scenario of two skaters, each with a mass of 85 kg, connecting via a pole while moving towards each other at 1.6 m/s on frictionless ice. To analyze their motion post-connection, the conservation of angular momentum is applied, with the moment of inertia calculated based on their distances from the axis of rotation. The initial angular momentum is set equal to the final angular momentum, leading to the equation involving their combined moment of inertia and angular speed. A participant expresses confusion over the calculations, particularly regarding the moment of inertia and the resulting angular speed, which they initially calculated as 0.229 rad/s but suspect is incorrect. The conversation emphasizes the need to correctly apply the principles of angular momentum and moment of inertia to derive the accurate angular speed after the skaters connect.
Punchlinegirl
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
Two skaters, each of mass 85 kg, approach each other along parallel paths separated by 3.5 m. They have equal and opposite velocities of 1.6 m/s. The first skater carries one end of a long pole with negligible mass, and the second skater grabs the other end of it as she passes. Assume frictionless ice. Describe quantitatively the motion of the skaters after they have become connected by the pole. What is their angular speed?

I know that to solve this I need to use conservation of angular momentum, but I'm unsure what the moment of inertia is. Would it just be .5MR^2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just add the moments of inertia of the two skaters with respect to the axis of rotation (center of pole). The moment of inertia of one person (treated as a point particle) is mr^2.
 
Ok, I used:
L init= L final
Iw= Iw
mr^2 = (mr^2 + mr^2) w
I converted the linear velocity to angular velocity, v=wr
subsituting gives
85(3.5^2)(.457)= 2(85)(3.5^2) w
and dividing gives w= .229 rad/s, which isn't right.
Can someone tell me what I did wrong?
 
Since the parameters for both skaters are the exactly the same both sides of the angular momentum equation will be exactly the same as well if you write them in terms of the same quantities.

I.e. Iw = Iw (2mr^2)w = (2mr^2)w

try using the fact that L = (m+m)vr = 2mvr along with Iw
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top