How and how much does is the cosmological red shift affected?

AI Thread Summary
The cosmological redshift observed in distant light sources is primarily due to their recession from Earth. However, this redshift can be slightly altered by passing through the local galactic gravitational well, resulting in a potential blue shift depending on the observer's motion. The impact of this effect is minimal, with typical velocities causing a linear frequency shift of about 1/1500 and gravitational effects resulting in an even smaller shift of 1/1,000,000. Observations near black holes can exhibit significant gravitational redshift, influenced by both motion and gravity. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate astrophysical measurements.
LuckyNate
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
When we look out into deep space we see a red shift in the light from distant sources because they are more or less all receding from us. How is the red shift distorted by passing through our local galactic gravitational well, before hitting us down here on the ground?(more red/more blue/no change) How acute is the impact of this effect?

Please say it so it's easy for me to read, I'm not a mathematician.
 
Space news on Phys.org
More blue for the gravitational potential, and depending on the direction for our motion through the galaxy.
The same effect size is present at the source, if it is within a galaxy.

To estimate the effect sizes:
The motion relative to the galaxy leads to a linear frequency shift. Typical velocities are 200km/s, so the relative shift is ##\frac{200 km/s}{300,000km/s} = \frac{1}{1500}##. We know our own velocity relative to our galaxy, this can be taken into account. The motion of the source depends on the type of source.

Gravitational effects are quadratic in the velocity. Typical escape velocities are 300km/s, so the relative shift is ##\frac{(300 km/s)^2}{(300,000km/s)^2} = \frac{1}{1,000,000}##. This corresponds to a really tiny velocity difference (<1km/s).

This gets different if you observe matter very close to a black hole. There, gravitational redshift (together with the motion of the objects) is important.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
To go along with mfb's reply this thread has an article covering the various forms of redshifts and causes.

Its written in a easy to understand manner just scroll down to the Redshift and expansion article

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=705427
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top