Mathematica - how to simplify an output formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying a complex output formula in Mathematica, where the user has attempted using both the Simplify and FullSimplify functions without success. The provided formula involves multiple variables, including GG, v45, MSR, t, and s, which the user wishes to keep as unknowns. Other users are encouraged to share code or methods that might effectively simplify the expression. The conversation highlights the challenges of simplifying intricate mathematical expressions in Mathematica. Ultimately, the goal is to find a more efficient way to achieve a simplified output.
Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Mathematica -- how to simplify an output formula

Hi all,

Is there any more options to simplify an out put Mathematica formula. I used //Simplify but the expression still
complicated and //FullSimplify too slow and didn't work.

Bests,
Safinaz
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Please provide your code.
 
Hi,
Here is that:1/s^2 266.428 GG^4 (-1. MSR^4 + s (1.69 - 1. t) -
1. (-1.69 + t) (-1.69 + t) +
MSR^2 (-3.38 + 2. t)) + (-8.5683 MSR^8 +
s^3 (3.62011 - 2.14208 t) +
MSR^6 (74.2122 + 8.5683 s + 24.6339 t) +
s^2 (-71.8863 - 5.43016 t - 5.89071 t^2) -
3.74863 (61.6102 - 3.38 t + t^2) (2.8561 - 3.38 t + t^2) -
7.49726 s (-1.69 + t) (26.5209 - 2.43421*10^-16 t + t^2) +
MSR^4 (-2.14208 s^2 + s (-66.0669 - 29.4535 t) -
27.3115 (0.639919 + t) (4.46322 + t)) +
MSR^2 (s^2 (7.24021 + 12.8525 t) +
14.9945 (-1.69 + t) (19.1767 + 4.34571 t + t^2) +
s (177.421 + 86.8826 t + 23.5628 t^2)))/((1.69 -
1. t)^2 (1.69 + 2. MSR^2 - 1. s -
1. t)^2 v45^4) + (GG^2 (-1383.72 + 71.6685 MSR^6 +
MSR^4 (-242.24 - 35.8343 s - 143.337 t) +
s^2 (-60.5599 - 35.8343 t) + 1637.54 t - 484.479 t^2 -
35.8343 s (-1.69 + t) (11.83 + t) +
MSR^2 (71.6685 (-1.69 + t) (11.83 + t) +
s (242.24 + 143.337 t))))/(s (1.69 - 1. t) (-1.69 -
2. MSR^2 + s + t) v45^2)

Where GG, v45, MSR,t , s are free varibles I 'd like to leave them as unknowns.

Safinaz
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top