Determine the total charge on the surface?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total charge on the surfaces of a hollow metal sphere and a solid metal sphere at its center. The electric field values at points P and Q indicate the nature of the charges, with inward direction suggesting negative charge for the inner sphere and outward direction for the outer sphere. Gauss's law is emphasized as the method to determine the total charge enclosed by a spherical surface, clarifying that the charge of the inner sphere remains constant regardless of the electric field changes. The inner surface of the hollow sphere is expected to have a charge equal to that of the inner sphere, while the outer surface charge needs further verification. Overall, the calculations hinge on applying Gauss's law correctly to derive the charges.
nuagerose
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A hollow metal sphere has inner and outer radii of 20.0 cm and 30.0 cm, respectively. As shown in the figure, a solid metal sphere of radius 10.0 cm is located at the center of the hollow sphere. The electric field at a point P, a distance of 15.0 cm from the center, is found to be E1 = 1.53·104 N/C, directed radially inward. At point Q, a distance of 35.0 cm from the center, the electric field is found to be E2 = 1.53·104 N/C, directed radially outward.

Image of the problem: http://postimg.org/image/6cnneik69/

a) Determine the total charge on the surface of the inner sphere.
b) Determine the total charge on the surface of the inner surface of the hollow sphere.
c) Determine the total charge on the surface of the outer surface of the hollow sphere.


Homework Equations



∫∫\vec{E} * \vec{dA} = \frac{q_{enc}}{E_{0}}



The Attempt at a Solution



For part (a), I believe that the charge on the inner sphere from point P would be negative, since it is directed radially inward, while the charge on the inner sphere from point Q would be positive.
If I plug in the values into the equation above, then add them together, would I arrive at the correct answer?

I am still working on part (b) and (c), but want to make sure that I've set up part (a) correctly first.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the direct link of image and put it in
[/IMG} tags replacing } with ]
[ATTACH=full]163767[/ATTACH]
Or attach it as an attachment.
 

Attachments

  • P056figure_new.png
    P056figure_new.png
    21.5 KB · Views: 875
  • P056figure_new.png
    P056figure_new.png
    19.1 KB · Views: 322
Last edited:
nuagerose said:
For part (a), I believe that the charge on the inner sphere from point P would be negative, since it is directed radially inward, while the charge on the inner sphere from point Q would be positive.
If I plug in the values into the equation above, then add them together, would I arrive at the correct answer?
Charge of inner sphere doesn't change with respect to different points. So 'charge on sphere from P' this statement is wrong. It is only electric field that changes.
Gauss law gives total charge enclosed by a surface. So for a spherical gaussian surface concentric with inner sphere and radius 15 cm i.e. passing through p shall enclose what charge?
 
Enigman said:
Charge of inner sphere doesn't change with respect to different points. So 'charge on sphere from P' this statement is wrong. It is only electric field that changes.
Gauss law gives total charge enclosed by a surface. So for a spherical gaussian surface concentric with inner sphere and radius 15 cm i.e. passing through p shall enclose what charge?

For the outer spherical shell, would it enclose the charge of the inner sphere?

Also, given your explanation, I can then use the known electric field value at point P to calculate the charge of the inner sphere? From there, how do I work toward the charges on the inner and outer surfaces of the outer shell? I think that the inner surface of the outer shell would be the same as the charge of the inner sphere, correct?
 
nuagerose said:
For the outer spherical shell, would it enclose the charge of the inner sphere?
Yep.
Also, given your explanation, I can then use the known electric field value at point P to calculate the charge of the inner sphere?
Yep.
From there, how do I work toward the charges on the inner and outer surfaces of the outer shell? I think that the inner surface of the outer shell would be the same as the charge of the inner sphere, correct?
Yeah, but you will need to prove that.Oh, and welcome to PF!
What's your favourite fish?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top