Collision of multiple particles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a collision problem involving multiple particles, where the original poster believes the answer should be e = 1, while the provided answer is 2/3. Respondents indicate that the method used by the poster is suitable only for two-particle collisions and suggest necessary adjustments for multiple particles. There is a consensus on the need to conserve momentum for the entire system, which may involve considering multiple lines of impact. Further adjustments and calculations are recommended to arrive at the correct solution.
coldblood
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Hi friends,
I have an issue in solving a Collision of multiple particles.
Please Help me in solving this.
Thank you all in advance.

The problem is as:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/q71/s720x720/1395304_1432383000322139_406785433_n.jpg


Attempt:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/q81/s720x720/1380665_1432380623655710_1216390070_n.jpg

Friends according to me the answer should be e = 1, which is not any option and question says answer is 2/3 which is Option (a). Please try to help me in this.
I will appreciate the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
coldblood said:
Hi friends,
I have an issue in solving a Collision of multiple particles.
Please Help me in solving this.
Thank you all in advance.

The problem is as:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/q71/s720x720/1395304_1432383000322139_406785433_n.jpg


Attempt:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/q81/s720x720/1380665_1432380623655710_1216390070_n.jpg

Friends according to me the answer should be e = 1, which is not any option and question says answer is 2/3 which is Option (a). Please try to help me in this.
I will appreciate the help.
The method you applied is applicable for two particle collision only. You'll need to do adjustments before applying this method.
 
NihalSh said:
The method you applied is applicable for two particle collision only. You'll need to do adjustments before applying this method.

Well if I'll conserve momentum for the whole system there would be two lines of imapact.
Ok first I'll do some adjustment in that and then will continue.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top