Breit-Wigner formula derivation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stickybees
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Formula
AI Thread Summary
The Breit-Wigner formula describes the interaction between a nucleus and an incident particle, highlighting how the probability of absorption increases when the particle's energy resonates with the energy state of the nucleus. The concept of resonance in this context refers to the discrete energy states of nucleons, similar to electron orbitals. Resonance widths indicate the range of energies over which this interaction is significant. The formula is particularly relevant for certain types of resonances that have a finite width in energy. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the underlying physics of nuclear interactions.
Stickybees
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know where this forumula comes from?

df10.gif


http://iopscience.iop.org/0067-0049/134/1/151/fulltext/

I don't quite understand the resonance widths, it's probably a naive question but what is 'resonating' in this context?

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I know nothing about this material. However, looking at the formula, it looks like E is resonating around ER.
 
Much like electron orbitals, the nucleons (protons and neutrons) in an atom have discrete energy states. When you have an interaction between an nucleus and an incident particle (proton or neutron for example), the probability that the incident particle will be absorbed is greatly increased if its energy resonates with the energy state of the product (or intermediate) nucleus. The Breit-Wigner formula describes this interaction for certain types of resonances. These resonances have a finite width in energy.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top