Showing there are no eigenvectors of the annhilation operator

Hakkinen
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show there are no eigenvectors of a^{\dagger} assuming the ground state |0> is the lowest energy state of the system.


Homework Equations


Coherent states of the SHO satisfy:
a|z> = z|z>


The Attempt at a Solution


Based on the hint that was given (assume there is such an eigenvector like the coherent state above and expand the state in the basis |n>) I tried this, but it seems too simple.

a^{\dagger}|0> = k|0> (is this expansion in the |n> basis? or |0> basis?)

then conjugate transpose both sides

a<0|=\bar{k}<0|

the lhs vanishes as a is acting on the ground state ket

Is this correct? Any help is greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Hakkinen!

You are not taking the conjugate transpose correctly - the left hand side should read \langle 0 \lvert a. That is, it should look like a row vector multiplying a matrix. The operator a "acts to the left" as a creation operator, not as an annihilation operator.
 
Oxvillian said:
Hello Hakkinen!

You are not taking the conjugate transpose correctly - the left hand side should read \langle 0 \lvert a. That is, it should look like a row vector multiplying a matrix. The operator a "acts to the left" as a creation operator, not as an annihilation operator.

Thanks for the reply! sorry for the simple mistakes

So is this not the correct approach to show this? If it is, should I start with a|0> = k|0> and then conjugate, leaving the annihilation operator acting on the ground state bra?

so 0 = <0|\bar{k}

but this doesn't necessarily show there are no eigenvectors of the ann. operator does it?
 
Well a\lvert 0 \rangle = 0, since \lvert 0 \rangle is the ground state. We need a new name for the hypothetical eigenstate of a^{\dagger}, let's just call it \lvert \psi \rangle. Then

a^{\dagger}\lvert \psi \rangle = \lambda \lvert \psi \rangle,

where \lambda is some number (the eigenvalue). Try expanding \lvert \psi \rangle in terms of the \lvert n \rangle and see what you get.
 
Note that people usually call a the annihilation operator, and a^\dagger the creation operator. The reason it is worth to avoid confusion here, is that the annihilation operator a (which satisfies a|0\rangle=0, where |0 is the ground state) actually has an eigenstate, while the creation operator does not.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top